Literature DB >> 17242881

Tracking silence: adjusting vocal production to avoid acoustic interference.

S E Roian Egnor1, Jeanette Graham Wickelgren, Marc D Hauser.   

Abstract

Organisms that use vocal signals to communicate often modulate their vocalizations to avoid being masked by other sounds in the environment. Although some environmental noise is continuous, both biotic and abiotic noise can be intermittent, or even periodic. Interference from intermittent noise can be avoided if calls are timed to coincide with periods of silence, a capacity that is unambiguously present in insects, amphibians, birds, and humans. Surprisingly, we know virtually nothing about this fundamental capacity in nonhuman primates. Here we show that a New World monkey, the cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus), can restrict calls to periodic silent intervals in loud white noise. In addition, calls produced during these silent intervals were significantly louder than calls recorded in silent baseline sessions. Finally, average call duration dropped across sessions, indicating that experience with temporally patterned noise caused tamarins to compress their calls. Taken together, these results show that in the presence of a predictable, intermittent environmental noise, cotton-top tamarins are able to modify the duration, timing, and amplitude of their calls to avoid acoustic interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17242881     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-006-0205-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

1.  Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frog Hyla ebraccata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds.

Authors:  Daniel J Mennill; Laurene M Ratcliffe; Peter T Boag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Overlapping signals in banded wrens: long-term effects of prior experience on males and females.

Authors:  Michelle L Hall; Anya Illes; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds.

Authors:  R W Ficken; M S Ficken; J P Hailman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  The units of perception in the antiphonal calling behavior of cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus): playback experiments with long calls.

Authors:  A A Ghazanfar; J I Flombaum; C T Miller; M D Hauser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  The degradation of distance discrimination in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) caused by different interference signals.

Authors:  W M Masters; K A Raver
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River Beluga.

Authors:  P M Scheifele; S Andrew; R A Cooper; M Darre; F E Musiek; L Max
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Noise-induced vocal modulation in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  S E Roian Egnor; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.371

10.  Interruptibility of long call production in tamarins: implications for vocal control.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Stephen Flusberg; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  The role of auditory feedback in vocal learning and maintenance.

Authors:  Katherine Tschida; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Motor planning for vocal production in common marmosets.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 3.  Corollary Discharge Mechanisms During Vocal Production in Marmoset Monkeys.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-06-29

Review 4.  The neurobiology of primate vocal communication.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Steven J Eliades
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Regulation of bat echolocation pulse acoustics by striatal dopamine.

Authors:  Jedediah Tressler; Christine Schwartz; Paul Wellman; Samuel Hughes; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Modification of spectral features by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Cara F Hotchkin; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Mapping vocalization-related immediate early gene expression in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Christine P Schwartz; Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Neural correlates of the lombard effect in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cooperative vocal control in marmoset monkeys via vocal feedback.

Authors:  Jung Yoon Choi; Daniel Y Takahashi; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The communicative content of the common marmoset phee call during antiphonal calling.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Katherine Mandel; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.371

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.