Literature DB >> 26702045

Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.

Eran Amichai1, Gaddi Blumrosen1, Yossi Yovel2.   

Abstract

Active-sensing systems such as echolocation provide animals with distinct advantages in dark environments. For social animals, however, like many bat species, active sensing can present problems as well: when many individuals emit bio-sonar calls simultaneously, detecting and recognizing the faint echoes generated by one's own calls amid the general cacophony of the group becomes challenging. This problem is often termed 'jamming' and bats have been hypothesized to solve it by shifting the spectral content of their calls to decrease the overlap with the jamming signals. We tested bats' response in situations of extreme interference, mimicking a high density of bats. We played-back bat echolocation calls from multiple speakers, to jam flying Pipistrellus kuhlii bats, simulating a naturally occurring situation of many bats flying in proximity. We examined behavioural and echolocation parameters during search phase and target approach. Under severe interference, bats emitted calls of higher intensity and longer duration, and called more often. Slight spectral shifts were observed but they did not decrease the spectral overlap with jamming signals. We also found that pre-existing inter-individual spectral differences could allow self-call recognition. Results suggest that the bats' response aimed to increase the signal-to-noise ratio and not to avoid spectral overlap.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lombard effect; acoustic interference; biosonar; echolocation; jamming-avoidance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26702045      PMCID: PMC4707756          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  23 in total

1.  'No cost of echolocation for flying bats' revisited.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Daniel Lewanzik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Rapid jamming avoidance in biosonar.

Authors:  Erin H Gillam; Nachum Ulanovsky; Gary F McCracken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  ECHOLOCATION BY BLIND MEN, BATS AND RADAR.

Authors:  D R Griffin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1944-12-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Tinglei Jiang; Sean W Berquist; Jiang Feng; Walter Metzner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats.

Authors:  Noam Cvikel; Eran Levin; Edward Hurme; Ivailo Borissov; Arjan Boonman; Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki; R I Pedlow; M A Stokes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The degradation of distance discrimination in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) caused by different interference signals.

Authors:  W M Masters; K A Raver
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

Authors:  B D Lawrence; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Interpulse interval modulation by echolocating big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in different densities of obstacle clutter.

Authors:  Anthony E Petrites; Oliver S Eng; Donald S Mowlds; James A Simmons; Caroline M DeLong
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Groups of bats improve sonar efficiency through mutual suppression of pulse emissions.

Authors:  Jenna Jarvis; William Jackson; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  18 in total

1.  Adaptations in the call emission pattern of frugivorous bats when orienting under challenging conditions.

Authors:  M Jerome Beetz; Manfred Kössl; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Modeling active sensing reveals echo detection even in large groups of bats.

Authors:  Thejasvi Beleyur; Holger R Goerlitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Adaptive learning and recall of motor-sensory sequences in adult echolocating bats.

Authors:  Mor Taub; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 7.431

4.  Insectivorous bats form mobile sensory networks to optimize prey localization: The case of the common noctule bat.

Authors:  Manuel Roeleke; Ulrike E Schlägel; Cara Gallagher; Jan Pufelski; Torsten Blohm; Ran Nathan; Sivan Toledo; Florian Jeltsch; Christian C Voigt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats.

Authors:  Amanda M Adams; Kaylee Davis; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Bats pre-adapt sensory acquisition according to target distance prior to takeoff even in the presence of closer background objects.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Bio-Inspired Covert Active Sonar Strategy.

Authors:  Jiajia Jiang; Xianquan Wang; Fajie Duan; Chunyue Li; Xiao Fu; Tingting Huang; Lingran Bu; Ling Ma; Zhongbo Sun
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats.

Authors:  Simone Götze; Jens C Koblitz; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A fully autonomous terrestrial bat-like acoustic robot.

Authors:  Itamar Eliakim; Zahi Cohen; Gabor Kosa; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Bats enhance their call identities to solve the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Kazuma Hase; Yukimi Kadoya; Yosuke Maitani; Takara Miyamoto; Kohta I Kobayasi; Shizuko Hiryu
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.