Literature DB >> 7085967

Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

B D Lawrence, J A Simmons.   

Abstract

The absorption of sound propagating through the atmosphere under laboratory conditions of 25 degrees C and 50% relative humidity was measured at frequencies from 30 to 200 kHz. The attenuating effect on the passage of ultrasonic sounds through air ranged from 0.7 dB/m at 30 kHz. These measurements confirm theoretical expectations and earlier observations that atmospheric attenuation is progressively more severe at higher frequencies and that the atmosphere acts as a low-pass filter for conducting sounds in the frequency range used for echolocation by bats. Different species of bats use different portions of this range of frequencies, and bats emitting sonar signals predominantly above 100 kHz encounter especially severe attenuation of over 3 dB/m. With the greatly restricted operating distances for echolocation at such high frequencies, bats using these higher frequencies must be under compelling ecological pressures of a higher priority than long-range detection of targets.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7085967     DOI: 10.1121/1.387529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  64 in total

1.  Spectral selectivity of FM-FM neurons in the auditory cortex of the echolocating bat, Myotis lucifugus.

Authors:  M Maekawa; D Wong; W G Paschal
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear.

Authors:  Matthew E Jackson; Navdeep S Asi; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Auditory-based defence against gleaning bats in neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Hannah M ter Hofstede; Elisabeth K V Kalko; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Gaddi Blumrosen; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Spatial processing within the mustache bat echolocation system: possible mechanisms for optimization.

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery; D J Hartley; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Rapid jamming avoidance in biosonar.

Authors:  Erin H Gillam; Nachum Ulanovsky; Gary F McCracken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Discrimination of jittered sonar echoes by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus: the shape of target images in echolocation.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M Ferragamo; C F Moss; S B Stevenson; R A Altes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  The sonar beam pattern of a flying bat as it tracks tethered insects.

Authors:  Kaushik Ghose; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.