Literature DB >> 19372379

Traditional waveform based spike sorting yields biased rate code estimates.

Valérie Ventura1.   

Abstract

Much of neuroscience has to do with relating neural activity and behavior or environment. One common measure of this relationship is the firing rates of neurons as functions of behavioral or environmental parameters, often called tuning functions and receptive fields. Firing rates are estimated from the spike trains of neurons recorded by electrodes implanted in the brain. Individual neurons' spike trains are not typically readily available, because the signal collected at an electrode is often a mixture of activities from different neurons and noise. Extracting individual neurons' spike trains from voltage signals, which is known as spike sorting, is one of the most important data analysis problems in neuroscience, because it has to be undertaken prior to any analysis of neurophysiological data in which more than one neuron is believed to be recorded on a single electrode. All current spike-sorting methods consist of clustering the characteristic spike waveforms of neurons. The sequence of first spike sorting based on waveforms, then estimating tuning functions, has long been the accepted way to proceed. Here, we argue that the covariates that modulate tuning functions also contain information about spike identities, and that if tuning information is ignored for spike sorting, the resulting tuning function estimates are biased and inconsistent, unless spikes can be classified with perfect accuracy. This means, for example, that the commonly used peristimulus time histogram is a biased estimate of the firing rate of a neuron that is not perfectly isolated. We further argue that the correct conceptual way to view the problem out is to note that spike sorting provides information about rate estimation and vice versa, so that the two relationships should be considered simultaneously rather than sequentially. Indeed we show that when spike sorting and tuning-curve estimation are performed in parallel, unbiased estimates of tuning curves can be recovered even from imperfectly sorted neurons.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19372379      PMCID: PMC2678477          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901771106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials.

Authors:  M S Lewicki
Journal:  Network       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.273

2.  Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements.

Authors:  K D Harris; D A Henze; J Csicsvari; H Hirase; G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Spike sorting based on discrete wavelet transform coefficients.

Authors:  J C Letelier; P P Weber
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Improved spike-sorting by modeling firing statistics and burst-dependent spike amplitude attenuation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach.

Authors:  Christophe Pouzat; Matthieu Delescluse; Pascal Viot; Jean Diebolt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Robust, automatic spike sorting using mixtures of multivariate t-distributions.

Authors:  Shy Shoham; Matthew R Fellows; Richard A Normann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 6.  Statistical issues in the analysis of neuronal data.

Authors:  Robert E Kass; Valérie Ventura; Emery N Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Analyzing functional connectivity using a network likelihood model of ensemble neural spiking activity.

Authors:  Murat Okatan; Matthew A Wilson; Emery N Brown
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  A neural network approach to real-time spike discrimination during simultaneous recording from several multi-unit nerve filaments.

Authors:  F Ohberg; H Johansson; M Bergenheim; J Pedersen; M Djupsjöbacka
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Unsupervised waveform classification for multi-neuron recordings: a real-time, software-based system. I. Algorithms and implementation.

Authors:  M Salganicoff; M Sarna; L Sax; G L Gerstein
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Automatic spike sorting using tuning information.

Authors:  Valérie Ventura
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.026

  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  Accurately estimating neuronal correlation requires a new spike-sorting paradigm.

Authors:  Valérie Ventura; Richard C Gerkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONY IN MULTIPLE NEURAL SPIKE TRAINS USING LOGLINEAR POINT PROCESS MODELS.

Authors:  Robert E Kass; Ryan C Kelly; Wei-Liem Loh
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Firing rate estimation using infinite mixture models and its application to neural decoding.

Authors:  Ryohei Shibue; Fumiyasu Komaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A framework for evaluating pairwise and multiway synchrony among stimulus-driven neurons.

Authors:  Ryan C Kelly; Robert E Kass
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  A computationally efficient method for incorporating spike waveform information into decoding algorithms.

Authors:  Valérie Ventura; Sonia Todorova
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  To sort or not to sort: the impact of spike-sorting on neural decoding performance.

Authors:  Sonia Todorova; Patrick Sadtler; Aaron Batista; Steven Chase; Valérie Ventura
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Bayesian decoding using unsorted spikes in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Fabian Kloosterman; Stuart P Layton; Zhe Chen; Matthew A Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Automatic spike sorting using tuning information.

Authors:  Valérie Ventura
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Clusterless Decoding of Position from Multiunit Activity Using a Marked Point Process Filter.

Authors:  Xinyi Deng; Daniel F Liu; Kenneth Kay; Loren M Frank; Uri T Eden
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.026

10.  A model-based spike sorting algorithm for removing correlation artifacts in multi-neuron recordings.

Authors:  Jonathan W Pillow; Jonathon Shlens; E J Chichilnisky; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.