Literature DB >> 19350230

The role of attention on the integration of visual and inertial cues.

Daniel R Berger1, Heinrich H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

The extent to which attending to one stimulus while ignoring another influences the integration of visual and inertial (vestibular, somatosensory, proprioceptive) stimuli is currently unknown. It is also unclear how cue integration is affected by an awareness of cue conflicts. We investigated these questions using a turn-reproduction paradigm, where participants were seated on a motion platform equipped with a projection screen and were asked to actively return a combined visual and inertial whole-body rotation around an earth-vertical axis. By introducing cue conflicts during the active return and asking the participants whether they had noticed a cue conflict, we measured the influence of each cue on the response. We found that the task instruction had a significant effect on cue weighting in the response, with a higher weight assigned to the attended modality, only when participants noticed the cue conflict. This suggests that participants used task-induced attention to reduce the influence of stimuli that conflict with the task instructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19350230      PMCID: PMC2733186          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1767-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  59 in total

1.  Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Jordi Navarra; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.

Authors:  Hannah B Helbig; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Multimodal Ternus: visual, tactile, and visuo-tactile grouping in apparent motion.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The representation of egomotion in the human brain.

Authors:  Matthew B Wall; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading.

Authors:  J Driver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

Authors:  M S Landy; L T Maloney; E B Johnston; M Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Crossmodal binding: evaluating the "unity assumption" using audiovisual speech stimuli.

Authors:  Argiro Vatakis; Charles Spence
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-07

10.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  9 in total

1.  Optimal visual-vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles.

Authors:  John S Butler; Jennifer L Campos; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Human spatial orientation in non-stationary environments: relation between self-turning perception and detection of surround motion.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Attention Networks in the Parietooccipital Cortex Modulate Activity of the Human Vestibular Cortex during Attentive Visual Processing.

Authors:  Sebastian M Frank; Maja Pawellek; Lisa Forster; Berthold Langguth; Martin Schecklmann; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Beyond motion extrapolation: vestibular contribution to head-rotation-induced flash-lag effects.

Authors:  Xin He; Jianying Bai; Yi Jiang; Tao Zhang; Min Bao
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Persistent perceptual delay for head movement onset relative to auditory stimuli of different durations and rise times.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Sophie M Raeder; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.

Authors:  Tricia L Gibo; Winfred Mugge; David A Abbink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Conscious awareness of a visuo-proprioceptive mismatch: Effect on cross-sensory recalibration.

Authors:  Anna Hsiao; Trevor Lee-Miller; Hannah J Block
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.152

9.  Objective fidelity evaluation in multisensory virtual environments: auditory cue fidelity in flight simulation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Li Ting Wong; Emma Timson; Philip Perfect; Mark D White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.