Literature DB >> 17899043

Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration.

Agnès Alsius1, Jordi Navarra, Salvador Soto-Faraco.   

Abstract

One of the classic examples of multisensory integration in humans occurs when speech sounds are combined with the sight of corresponding articulatory gestures. Despite the longstanding assumption that this kind of audiovisual binding operates in an attention-free mode, recent findings (Alsius et al. in Curr Biol, 15(9):839-843, 2005) suggest that audiovisual speech integration decreases when visual or auditory attentional resources are depleted. The present study addressed the generalization of this attention constraint by testing whether a similar decrease in multisensory integration is observed when attention demands are imposed on a sensory domain that is not involved in speech perception, such as touch. We measured the McGurk illusion in a dual task paradigm involving a difficult tactile task. The results showed that the percentage of visually influenced responses to audiovisual stimuli was reduced when attention was diverted to a tactile task. This finding is attributed to a modulatory effect on audiovisual integration of speech mediated by supramodal attention limitations. We suggest that the interactions between the attentional system and crossmodal binding mechanisms may be much more extensive and dynamic than it was advanced in previous studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17899043     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1110-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

Review 1.  Visual attention: insights from brain imaging.

Authors:  N Kanwisher; E Wojciulik
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention.

Authors:  P Bertelson; J Vroomen; B de Gelder; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

3.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-05

5.  Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; José Van Velzen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Human brain activity associated with audiovisual perception and attention.

Authors:  Alexander Degerman; Teemu Rinne; Johanna Pekkola; Taina Autti; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Mikko Sams; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex.

Authors:  Nienke M van Atteveldt; Elia Formisano; Rainer Goebel; Leo Blomert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Integral processing of visual place and auditory voicing information during phonetic perception.

Authors:  K P Green; P K Kuhl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.

Authors:  J Duncan; S Martens; R Ward
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The bimodal perception of speech in infancy.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; A N Meltzoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  45 in total

1.  The role of attention on the integration of visual and inertial cues.

Authors:  Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Crossmodal influences in somatosensory cortex: Interaction of vision and touch.

Authors:  Jennifer K Dionne; Sean K Meehan; Wynn Legon; W Richard Staines
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Sustained selective intermodal attention modulates processing of language-like stimuli.

Authors:  Christian Keitel; Erich Schröger; Katja Saupe; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Searching for audiovisual correspondence in multiple speaker scenarios.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.

Authors:  Luis Morís Fernández; Emiliano Macaluso; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration.

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Daniel Senkowski; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.

Authors:  Demet Gurler; Nathan Doyle; Edgar Walker; John Magnotti; Michael Beauchamp
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Becoming a Lunari or Taiyo expert: learned attention to parts drives holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Look who's talking: the deployment of visuo-spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Dave Saint-Amour; Thomas Gruber; John J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory.

Authors:  Martijn Baart; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.