Literature DB >> 17684735

Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.

Jennifer L Mozolic1, Christina E Hugenschmidt, Ann M Peiffer, Paul J Laurienti.   

Abstract

Stimuli occurring in multiple sensory modalities that are temporally synchronous or spatially coincident can be integrated together to enhance perception. Additionally, the semantic content or meaning of a stimulus can influence cross-modal interactions, improving task performance when these stimuli convey semantically congruent or matching information, but impairing performance when they contain non-matching or distracting information. Attention is one mechanism that is known to alter processing of sensory stimuli by enhancing perception of task-relevant information and suppressing perception of task-irrelevant stimuli. It is not known, however, to what extent attention to a single sensory modality can minimize the impact of stimuli in the unattended sensory modality and reduce the integration of stimuli across multiple sensory modalities. Our hypothesis was that modality-specific selective attention would limit processing of stimuli in the unattended sensory modality, resulting in a reduction of performance enhancements produced by semantically matching multisensory stimuli, and a reduction in performance decrements produced by semantically non-matching multisensory stimuli. The results from two experiments utilizing a cued discrimination task demonstrate that selective attention to a single sensory modality prevents the integration of matching multisensory stimuli that is normally observed when attention is divided between sensory modalities. Attention did not reliably alter the amount of distraction caused by non-matching multisensory stimuli on this task; however, these findings highlight a critical role for modality-specific selective attention in modulating multisensory integration.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17684735     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1080-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention.

Authors:  P Bertelson; J Vroomen; B de Gelder; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

2.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Directing attention to locations and to sensory modalities: multiple levels of selective processing revealed with PET.

Authors:  E Macaluso; C D Frith; J Driver
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Spatial attention modulates sound localization in barn owls.

Authors:  A Johnen; H Wagner; B H Gaese
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates.

Authors:  Jennifer A Johnson; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  The neurobiology of selective attention.

Authors:  M I Posner; J Driver
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

8.  Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality-dependent.

Authors:  P W Woodruff; R R Benson; P A Bandettini; K K Kwong; R J Howard; T Talavage; J Belliveau; B R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-08-12       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict.

Authors:  Jin Fan; Jonathan I Flombaum; Bruce D McCandliss; Kathleen M Thomas; Michael I Posner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Superior colliculus lesions preferentially disrupt multisensory orientation.

Authors:  L R Burnett; B E Stein; D Chaponis; M T Wallace
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  52 in total

1.  The role of attention on the integration of visual and inertial cues.

Authors:  Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.

Authors:  Raymond van Ee; Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Amanda L Parker; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Searching for audiovisual correspondence in multiple speaker scenarios.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Multisensory integration and age-dependent sensitivity to body representation modification induced by the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  János Kállai; Péter Kincses; Beatrix Lábadi; Krisztina Dorn; Tibor Szolcsányi; Gergely Darnai; Ernő Hupuczi; József Janszky; Árpád Csathó
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-08-05

5.  The effect of multisensory cues on attention in aging.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Joe Verghese; Kristina Dumas; Cuiling Wang; Roee Holtzer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Delayed audiovisual integration of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease compared with normal aged controls.

Authors:  Jinglong Wu; Jiajia Yang; Yinghua Yu; Qi Li; Naoya Nakamura; Yong Shen; Yasuyuki Ohta; Shengyuan Yu; Koji Abe
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.472

7.  Cue-target onset asynchrony modulates interaction between exogenous attention and audiovisual integration.

Authors:  Zhihan Xu; Weiping Yang; Zhenhua Zhou; Yanna Ren
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2020-01-17

8.  Aging Impairs Temporal Sensitivity, but not Perceptual Synchrony, Across Modalities.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Tiziana Vercillo; Alexis Nicholson; Michael Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

9.  Suppression of multisensory integration by modality-specific attention in aging.

Authors:  Christina E Hugenschmidt; Jennifer L Mozolic; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Preservation of crossmodal selective attention in healthy aging.

Authors:  Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Thomas P McCoy; Satoru Hayasaka; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.