Literature DB >> 22580574

Persistent perceptual delay for head movement onset relative to auditory stimuli of different durations and rise times.

Michael Barnett-Cowan1, Sophie M Raeder, Heinrich H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

The perception of simultaneity between auditory and vestibular information is crucially important for maintaining a coherent representation of the acoustic environment whenever the head moves. It has been recently reported, however, that despite having similar transduction latencies, vestibular stimuli are perceived significantly later than auditory stimuli when simultaneously generated. This suggests that perceptual latency of a head movement is longer than a co-occurring sound. However, these studies paired a vestibular stimulation of long duration (~1 s) and of a continuously changing temporal envelope with a brief (10-50 ms) sound pulse. In the present study, the stimuli were matched for temporal envelope duration and shape. Participants judged the temporal order of the two stimuli, the onset of an active head movement and the onset of brief (50 ms) or long (1,400 ms) sounds with a square- or raised-cosine-shaped envelope. Consistent with previous reports, head movement onset had to precede the onset of a brief sound by about 73 ms in order for the stimuli to be perceived as simultaneous. Head movements paired with long square sounds (~100 ms) were not significantly different than brief sounds. Surprisingly, head movements paired with long raised-cosine sound (~115 ms) had to be presented even earlier than brief stimuli. This additional lead time could not be accounted for by differences in the comparison stimulus characteristics (temporal envelope duration and shape). Rather, differences between sound conditions were found to be attributable to variability in the time for head movement to reach peak velocity: the head moved faster when paired with a brief sound. The persistent lead time required for vestibular stimulation provides further evidence that the perceptual latency of vestibular stimulation is greater than the other senses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22580574      PMCID: PMC3375482          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3112-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Multisensory cortical signal increases and decreases during vestibular galvanic stimulation (fMRI).

Authors:  S Bense; T Stephan; T A Yousry; T Brandt; M Dieterich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Current approaches and future directions to understanding control of head movement.

Authors:  Barry W Peterson
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 3.  Multisensory integration: maintaining the perception of synchrony.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Sarah Squire
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Dissociating self-generated from passively applied head motion: neural mechanisms in the vestibular nuclei.

Authors:  Jefferson E Roy; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Vestibular projections in the human cortex.

Authors:  C de Waele; P M Baudonnière; J C Lepecq; P Tran Ba Huy; P P Vidal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modeling direction discrimination thresholds for yaw rotations around an earth-vertical axis for arbitrary motion profiles.

Authors:  Florian Soyka; Paolo Robuffo Giordano; Michael Barnett-Cowan; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The relationship between the duration of a stimulus and the duration of a perception.

Authors:  R Efron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The minimum duration of a perception.

Authors:  R Efron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating semicircular canals of the squirrel monkey. II. Response to sinusoidal stimulation and dynamics of peripheral vestibular system.

Authors:  C Fernandez; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Visual-auditory distance constancy.

Authors:  G R Engel; W G Dougherty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-12-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  Gain and phase of perceived virtual rotation evoked by electrical vestibular stimuli.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Brandon G Rasman; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Persistent perceptual delay for active head movement onset relative to sound onset with and without vision.

Authors:  William Chung; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Integration of visual and inertial cues in the perception of angular self-motion.

Authors:  K N de Winkel; F Soyka; M Barnett-Cowan; H H Bülthoff; E L Groen; P J Werkhoven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  MPI CyberMotion Simulator: implementation of a novel motion simulator to investigate multisensory path integration in three dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Tobias Meilinger; Manuel Vidal; Harald Teufel; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Temporal processing of self-motion: modeling reaction times for rotations and translations.

Authors:  Florian Soyka; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Articulation and Dynamics Influence the Perceptual Attack Time of Saxophone Sounds.

Authors:  Toni Amadeus Bechtold; Olivier Senn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.