Literature DB >> 21241645

Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.

Samira Anderson1, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Speech-in-noise (SIN) perception is one of the most complex tasks faced by listeners on a daily basis. Although listening in noise presents challenges for all listeners, background noise inordinately affects speech perception in older adults and in children with learning disabilities. Hearing thresholds are an important factor in SIN perception, but they are not the only factor. For successful comprehension, the listener must perceive and attend to relevant speech features, such as the pitch, timing, and timbre of the target speaker's voice. Here, we review recent studies linking SIN and brainstem processing of speech sounds.
PURPOSE: To review recent work that has examined the ability of the auditory brainstem response to complex sounds (cABR), which reflects the nervous system's transcription of pitch, timing, and timbre, to be used as an objective neural index for hearing-in-noise abilities. STUDY SAMPLE: We examined speech-evoked brainstem responses in a variety of populations, including children who are typically developing, children with language-based learning impairment, young adults, older adults, and auditory experts (i.e., musicians). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: In a number of studies, we recorded brainstem responses in quiet and babble noise conditions to the speech syllable /da/ in all age groups, as well as in a variable condition in children in which /da/ was presented in the context of seven other speech sounds. We also measured speech-in-noise perception using the Hearing-in-Noise Test (HINT) and the Quick Speech-in-Noise Test (QuickSIN).
RESULTS: Children and adults with poor SIN perception have deficits in the subcortical spectrotemporal representation of speech, including low-frequency spectral magnitudes and the timing of transient response peaks. Furthermore, auditory expertise, as engendered by musical training, provides both behavioral and neural advantages for processing speech in noise.
CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications for future assessment and management strategies for young and old populations whose primary complaint is difficulty hearing in background noise. The cABR provides a clinically applicable metric for objective assessment of individuals with SIN deficits, for determination of the biologic nature of disorders affecting SIN perception, for evaluation of appropriate hearing aid algorithms, and for monitoring the efficacy of auditory remediation and training. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21241645      PMCID: PMC3075209          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.9.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  80 in total

1.  Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  J Cunningham; T Nicol; S G Zecker; A Bradlow; N Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Multiparametric corticofugal modulation and plasticity in the auditory system.

Authors:  Nobuo Suga; Xiaofeng Ma
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians.

Authors:  Antoine Shahin; Daniel J Bosnyak; Laurel J Trainor; Larry E Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan Fritz; Shihab Shamma; Mounya Elhilali; David Klein
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Experience-dependent plasticity in the auditory cortex and the inferior colliculus of bats: role of the corticofugal system.

Authors:  E Gao; N Suga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Michael Piskosz; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  A comparison of the effects of broadband masking noise on the auditory brainstem response in young and older adults.

Authors:  Robert F Burkard; Donald Sims
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Primitive auditory stream segregation: a neurophysiological study in the songbird forebrain.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  26 in total

1.  Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.

Authors:  Jonathan Benichov; L Clarke Cox; Patricia A Tun; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Melyssa K Fink; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Musical training sharpens and bonds ears and tongue to hear speech better.

Authors:  Yi Du; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Anusha Yellamsetty; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Brief Report: Speech-in-Noise Recognition and the Relation to Vocal Pitch Perception in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development.

Authors:  Stefanie Schelinski; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-01

7.  Sustained envelope periodicity representations are associated with speech-in-noise performance in difficult listening conditions for younger and older adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Musical Experience Offsets Age-Related Decline in Understanding Speech-in-Noise: Type of Training Does Not Matter, Working Memory Is the Key.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Xueying Fu; Dan Luo; Lidongsheng Xing; Yi Du
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Musical training, individual differences and the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Christine R Mason; Timothy M Streeter; Virginia Best; Gerald Kidd; Aniruddh D Patel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Modulation of the Primary Auditory Thalamus When Recognizing Speech with Background Noise.

Authors:  Paul Glad Mihai; Nadja Tschentscher; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.