Literature DB >> 19332841

Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Mark P Little1, Richard Wakeford, E Janet Tawn, Simon D Bouffler, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19332841      PMCID: PMC2663578          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2511081686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  70 in total

1.  FISH chromosome aberration analysis on retired radiation workers from the Sellafield nuclear facility.

Authors:  E Janet Tawn; Caroline A Whitehouse; Robert E Tarone
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

3.  Risks of leukemia in Japanese atomic bomb survivors, in women treated for cervical cancer, and in patients treated for ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  M P Little; H A Weiss; J D Boice; S C Darby; N E Day; C R Muirhead
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  The bystander effect in C3H 10T cells and radon-induced lung cancer.

Authors:  M P Little; R Wakeford
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. A report of a Task Group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1994

6.  The shape of the cancer mortality dose-response curve for the A-bomb survivors.

Authors:  D A Pierce; M Vaeth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries.

Authors:  E Cardis; M Vrijheid; M Blettner; E Gilbert; M Hakama; C Hill; G Howe; J Kaldor; C R Muirhead; M Schubauer-Berigan; T Yoshimura; F Bermann; G Cowper; J Fix; C Hacker; B Heinmiller; M Marshall; I Thierry-Chef; D Utterback; Y-O Ahn; E Amoros; P Ashmore; A Auvinen; J-M Bae; J Bernar Solano; A Biau; E Combalot; P Deboodt; A Diez Sacristan; M Eklof; H Engels; G Engholm; G Gulis; R Habib; K Holan; H Hyvonen; A Kerekes; J Kurtinaitis; H Malker; M Martuzzi; A Mastauskas; A Monnet; M Moser; M S Pearce; D B Richardson; F Rodriguez-Artalejo; A Rogel; H Tardy; M Telle-Lamberton; I Turai; M Usel; K Veress
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-29

8.  Chromosomal instability in in vivo radiation exposed subjects.

Authors:  S Salomaa; K Holmberg; C Lindholm; R Mustonen; M Tekkel; T Veidebaum; B Lambert
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Thyroid cancer after radiotherapy for skin hemangioma in infancy.

Authors:  M Lundell; T Hakulinen; L E Holm
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Lung cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with lung cancer mortality in the Atomic Bomb survivors study.

Authors:  G R Howe
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  95 in total

Review 1.  Low-dose cardiovascular computed tomography: where are the limits?

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Carla M Thompson; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Airway imaging in disease: gimmick or useful tool?

Authors:  Peter D Paré; Taishi Nagano; Harvey O Coxson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-05-17

Review 4.  Low dose CT of the heart: a quantum leap into a new era of cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  E Maffei; C Martini; S De Crescenzo; T Arcadi; A Clemente; E Capuano; A Rossi; R Malagò; N Mollet; A Weustink; C Tedeschi; L La Grutta; S Seitun; A Igoren Guaricci; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Radiation risk from medical imaging.

Authors:  Eugene C Lin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Low-dose computed tomography of the paranasal sinus and facial skull using a high-pitch dual-source system--first clinical results.

Authors:  Boris Schell; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas Lehnert; J Matthias Kerl; Markus Hambek; Angelika May; Thomas J Vogl; Martin G Mack
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Kwang Pyo Kim; Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Judy Yee; Karen M Kuntz; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Christine D Berg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

9.  Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Kazataka Doi; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Terrence Lee; Jeremy S Miller; Diane M Kampa; Parveen Bhatti; James D Tucker; Martha S Linet; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Patients with testicular cancer undergoing CT surveillance demonstrate a pitfall of radiation-induced cancer risk estimates: the timing paradox.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Richard J Lee; Michael E Gilmore; Ekin A Turan; Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Bob Liu; Chung Yin Kong; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.