Literature DB >> 11741492

The bystander effect in C3H 10T cells and radon-induced lung cancer.

M P Little1, R Wakeford.   

Abstract

Little, M. P. and Wakeford, R. The Bystander Effect in C3H 10T(1/2) Cells and Radon-Induced Lung Cancer. Radiat. Res. 156, 695-699 (2001).Bystander effects, whereby cells that are not directly exposed to radiation exhibit adverse biological effects, have been observed in a number of experimental systems, including C3H 10T(1/2) cells exposed to alpha-particle radiation. The bystander effect implies that risks from exposure to low doses of radiation obtained by linear extrapolation from data for high-dose exposures might be substantial underestimates. The best estimate of the ratio of the lung cancer risk among persons exposed to low (residential) doses of radon daughters to that among persons (underground miners) exposed to high doses of radon daughters is in the range of 2.4-4.0, with an upper 95% confidence limit of about 14. Assuming that the bystander effect observed in the in vitro C3H 10T(1/2) cell system applies to human lung cells in vivo, these epidemiological data imply that the central estimate of the number of neighboring cells that can contribute to the bystander effect is between 0 and 1, with an upper 95% confidence limit of about 7. As a consequence, the bystander effect observed in the experimental C3H 10T(1/2) cell system probably does not play a large part in the process of radon-induced lung carcinogenesis in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11741492     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0695:tbeicc]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  11 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes of patients treated with radium-224 for ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  G Stephan; W U Kampen; D Nosske; H Roos
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; E Janet Tawn; Simon D Bouffler; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Human lung cancer risks from radon - part I - influence from bystander effects - a microdose analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Human Lung Cancer Risks from Radon - Part II - Influence from Combined Adaptive Response and Bystander Effects - A Microdose Analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  "Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model"--HeLa x skin exposure to Cs not protective bystander response but mammogram and diagnostic X-rays are.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Human Lung Cancer Risks from Radon - Part III - Evidence of Influence of Combined Bystander and Adaptive Response Effects on Radon Case-Control Studies - A Microdose Analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 9.  Do non-targeted effects increase or decrease low dose risk in relation to the linear-non-threshold (LNT) model?

Authors:  M P Little
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  A model for the induction of chromosome aberrations through direct and bystander mechanisms.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; R E J Mitchel; D J Crawford-Brown; W Hofmann
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.