Literature DB >> 19330143

Low-dose radiation and genotoxic chemicals can protect against stochastic biological effects.

Bobby R Scott1, Dale M Walker, Vernon E Walker.   

Abstract

A protective apoptosis-mediated (PAM) process that is turned on in mammalian cells by low-dose photon (X and gamma) radiation and appears to also be turned on by the genotoxic chemical ethylene oxide is discussed. Because of the PAM process, exposure to low-dose photon radiation (and possibly also some genotoxic chemicals) can lead to a reduction in the risk of stochastic effects such as problematic mutations, neoplastic transformation (an early step in cancer occurrence), and cancer. These findings indicate a need to revise the current low-dose risk assessment paradigm for which risk of cancer is presumed to increase linearly with dose (without a threshold) after exposure to any amount of a genotoxic agent such as ionizing radiation. These findings support a view seldom mentioned in the past, that cancer risk can actually decrease, rather than increase, after exposure to low doses of photon radiation and possibly some other genotoxic agents. The PAM process (a form of natural protection) may contribute substantially to cancer prevention in humans and other mammals. However, new research is needed to improve our understanding of the process. The new research could unlock novel strategies for optimizing cancer prevention and novel protocols for low-dose therapy for cancer. With low-dose cancer therapy, normal tissue could be spared from severe damage while possibly eliminating the cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethylene oxide; low dose; radiation; risk assessment; threshold

Year:  2004        PMID: 19330143      PMCID: PMC2657487          DOI: 10.1080/15401420490507602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med        ISSN: 1540-1421


  105 in total

1.  Controlling the efficiency of excision repair.

Authors:  P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2001-02-25       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Macromolecular adducts of ethylene oxide: a literature review and a time-course study on the formation of 7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine following exposures of rats by inhalation.

Authors:  V E Walker; T R Fennell; J A Boucheron; N Fedtke; F Ciroussel; J A Swenberg
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Bystander-induced apoptosis and premature differentiation in primary urothelial explants after charged particle microbeam irradiation.

Authors:  O V Belyakov; M Folkard; C Mothersill; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  Hormesis: the dose-response revolution.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; Linda A Baldwin
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 5.  Adaptive response to DNA-damaging agents: a review of potential mechanisms.

Authors:  C Stecca; G B Gerber
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  Intercellular induction of apoptosis in transformed cells does not depend on p53.

Authors:  M L Hipp; G Bauer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1997-08-14       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Induction of genomic instability in normal human bronchial epithelial cells by 238Pu alpha-particles.

Authors:  C H Kennedy; C E Mitchell; N H Fukushima; R E Neft; J F Lechner
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells.

Authors:  C Mothersill; C Seymour
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  TGF-beta and FGF-trigger intercellular induction of apoptosis: analogous activity on non-transformed but differential activity on transformed cells.

Authors:  S Dormann; G Bauer
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.650

10.  No association between p53 status and alpha-particle-induced chromosomal instability in human lymphoblastoid cells.

Authors:  M A Kadhim; C A Walker; M A Plumb; E G Wright
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.694

View more
  10 in total

1.  Modeling DNA double-strand break repair kinetics as an epiregulated cell-community-wide (epicellcom) response to radiation stress.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Stochastic thresholds: a novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Detrimental and protective bystander effects: a model approach.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; R E J Mitchel; J L Redpath; D J Crawford-Brown; W Hofmann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Low-dose radiation-induced protective process and implications for risk assessment, cancer prevention, and cancer therapy.

Authors:  B R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Low-LET-induced radioprotective mechanisms within a stochastic two-stage cancer model.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; R D Stewart; R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  An examination of radiation hormesis mechanisms using a multistage carcinogenesis model.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; R D Stewart; R E J Mitchel; W Hofmann
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-10

Review 10.  REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE MECHANISTIC MODELS OF RADIATION-INDUCED NON-TARGETED EFFECTS (NTE).

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 0.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.