Literature DB >> 18648608

Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Bobby R Scott1, Jennifer Di Palma.   

Abstract

Routine diagnostic X-rays (e.g., chest X-rays, mammograms, computed tomography scans) and routine diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures using sparsely ionizing radiation forms (e.g., beta and gamma radiations) stimulate the removal of precancerous neo-plastically transformed and other genomically unstable cells from the body (medical radiation hormesis). The indicated radiation hormesis arises because radiation doses above an individual-specific stochastic threshold activate a system of cooperative protective processes that include high-fidelity DNA repair/apoptosis (presumed p53 related), an auxiliary apoptosis process (PAM process) that is presumed p53-independent, and stimulated immunity. These forms of induced protection are called adapted protection because they are associated with the radiation adaptive response. Diagnostic X-ray sources, other sources of sparsely ionizing radiation used in nuclear medicine diagnostic procedures, as well as radioisotope-labeled immunoglobulins could be used in conjunction with apoptosis-sensitizing agents (e.g., the natural phenolic compound resveratrol) in curing existing cancer via low-dose fractionated or low-dose, low-dose-rate therapy (therapeutic radiation hormesis). Evidence is provided to support the existence of both therapeutic (curing existing cancer) and medical (cancer prevention) radiation hormesis. Evidence is also provided demonstrating that exposure to environmental sparsely ionizing radiations, such as gamma rays, protect from cancer occurrence and the occurrence of other diseases via inducing adapted protection (environmental radiation hormesis).

Entities:  

Keywords:  LNT; adaptive response; radiation hormesis

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648608      PMCID: PMC2477699          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-002.Scott

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  58 in total

1.  Low-dose radiation: thresholds, bystander effects, and adaptive responses.

Authors:  William M Bonner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Resveratrol causes WAF-1/p21-mediated G(1)-phase arrest of cell cycle and induction of apoptosis in human epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells.

Authors:  N Ahmad; V M Adhami; F Afaq; D K Feyes; H Mukhtar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Diagnostic x-ray procedures and risk of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J D Boice; M M Morin; A G Glass; G D Friedman; M Stovall; R N Hoover; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Total body irradiation as treatment for lymphosarcoma.

Authors:  J T Chaffey; D S Rosenthal; W C Moloney; S Hellman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  The immunobiology of low-dose total-body irradiation: more questions than answers.

Authors:  A Safwat
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Resveratrol, an antioxidant present in red wine, induces apoptosis in human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) cells.

Authors:  Y J Surh; Y J Hurh; J Y Kang; E Lee; G Kong; S J Lee
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  Lung cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with lung cancer mortality in the Atomic Bomb survivors study.

Authors:  G R Howe
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiations become refractory to high doses of radiation as well as to chemical mutagens that induce double-strand breaks in DNA.

Authors:  S Wolff; V Afzal; J K Wiencke; G Olivieri; A Michaeli
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1988-01

10.  Cancer mortality survey in a spa area (Misasa, Japan) with a high radon background.

Authors:  M Mifune; T Sobue; H Arimoto; Y Komoto; S Kondo; H Tanooka
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1992-01
View more
  22 in total

1.  Assessing potential radiological harm to fukushima recovery workers.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Special issue introduction.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Twilight effects of low doses of ionizing radiation on cellular systems: a bird's eye view on current concepts and research.

Authors:  Ilaria Postiglione; Angela Chiaviello; Giuseppe Palumbo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Evidence for radiation hormesis after in vitro exposure of human lymphocytes to low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  No Evidence for the In Vivo Induction of Genomic Instability by Low Doses of CS Gamma Rays in Bone Marrow Cells of BALB/CJ and C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Chatchanok Udomtanakunchai; Louise M Honikel; Elbert B Whorton
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Cancer mortality, state mean elevations, and other selected predictors.

Authors:  John Hart; Seunggeun Hyun
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 9.  Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Vittorio Calabrese; Carolin Cornelius; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Edward J Calabrese; Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 8.401

10.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.