Literature DB >> 9154145

Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells.

C Mothersill1, C Seymour.   

Abstract

The results reported in this paper show a highly significant fall in cloning efficiency in unirradiated normal and malignant epithelial cell lines receiving medium from irradiated cultures. Medium irradiated in the absence of cells had no effect nor did irradiated medium from a fibroblast line, but irradiated medium from epithelial cells had an extremely toxic effect on unirradiated fibroblasts. Cells from four different cell lines were seeded, using standard techniques, 6 h prior to irradiation with cobalt 60 (Co60). At various times ranging from 1-60 h after irradiation, medium was removed, passed through a 0.22 mu filter and then used to replace the medium from parallel cultures seeded at cloning densities which had not been irradiated. The effect produced by the epithelial cell cultures was dependent on the cell number present at the time of irradiation, suggesting that a cell-derived factor is involved. The effect could be observed using medium taken from irradiated cultures as soon as 30 min/post irradiation. Examination of unirradiated cultures 48 h after receiving irradiated medium revealed the presence of high numbers of apoptotic bodies and other morphological evidence suggesting apoptosis may be a prominent mechanism of cell death responsible for the reduced cloning efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9154145     DOI: 10.1080/095530097144030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  110 in total

1.  Cell communication and the "bystander effect".

Authors:  C Seymour; C Mothersill
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Bystander effects caused by nonuniform distributions of DNA-incorporated (125)I.

Authors:  Roger W Howell; Anupam Bishayee
Journal:  Micron       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.251

3.  Bystander effect on cell growth stimulation in neoplastic HSGc cells induced by heavy-ion irradiation.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Mizuho Aoki; Yoshiya Furusawa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes of patients treated with radium-224 for ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  G Stephan; W U Kampen; D Nosske; H Roos
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 5.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Linking the history of radiation biology to the hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  Mary-Keara Boss; Robert Bristow; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Oxidative DNA damage caused by inflammation may link to stress-induced non-targeted effects.

Authors:  Carl N Sprung; Alesia Ivashkevich; Helen B Forrester; Christophe E Redon; Alexandros Georgakilas; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 8.  Redox-modulated phenomena and radiation therapy: the central role of superoxide dismutases.

Authors:  Aaron K Holley; Lu Miao; Daret K St Clair; William H St Clair
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 8.401

9.  MiR-21 is involved in radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Nan Ding; Hailong Pei; Wentao Hu; Wenjun Wei; Xurui Zhang; Guangming Zhou; Jufang Wang
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.652

10.  Mitochondrial function and nuclear factor-kappaB-mediated signaling in radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Hongning Zhou; Vladimir N Ivanov; Yu-Chin Lien; Mercy Davidson; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.