Literature DB >> 18648600

Low-dose radiation-induced protective process and implications for risk assessment, cancer prevention, and cancer therapy.

B R Scott1.   

Abstract

A low-dose protective apoptosis-mediated (PAM) process is discussed that appears to be turned on by low-dose gamma and X rays but not by low-dose alpha radiation. PAM is a bystander effect that involves cross-talk between genomically compromised [e.g., mutants, neoplastically transformed, micronucleated] cells and nongenomically compromised cells. A novel neoplastic cell transformation model, NEOTRANS(3), is discussed that includes PAM. With NEOTRANS(3), PAM is activated by low doses and inhibited by moderate or high doses and is, therefore, a hormetic process. A low-dose region of suppression of the transformation frequency below the spontaneous frequency relates to the hormetic zone over which PAM is presumed to operate. The magnitude of suppression relates to what is called the hormetic intensity. Both the hormetic intensity and width of the hormetic zone are expected to depend on dose rate, being more pronounced after low dose rates. It is expected that PAM likely had a significant role in the following observations after chronic irradiation: (1) what appears to be a tremendous reduction in the cancer incidence below the spontaneous level for Taiwanese citizens residing for years in cobalt-60 contaminated apartments; and (2) the published reductions in the lung cancer incidence below the spontaneous level in humans after protracted X irradiation and after chronic gamma plus alpha irradiation. Implications of PAM for cancer prevention and low-dose cancer therapy are briefly discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-dose radiation; adaptive response; bystander effect; hormesis

Year:  2007        PMID: 18648600      PMCID: PMC2477691          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.05-037.Scott

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  29 in total

1.  Application of Bayesian inference to characterize risks associated with low doses of low-LET radiation.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; B R Scott; T E Hanson
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 2.  How can tumor cells escape intercellular induction of apoptosis?

Authors:  I Engelmann; G Bauer
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

4.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Resistance to tgf-Beta-induced elimination of transformed-cells is required during tumor progression (review-hypothesis).

Authors:  G Bauer
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Caspase-independent cell death by arsenic trioxide in human cervical cancer cells: reactive oxygen species-mediated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 activation signals apoptosis-inducing factor release from mitochondria.

Authors:  Young-Hee Kang; Min-Jung Yi; Min-Jung Kim; Moon-Taek Park; Sangwoo Bae; Chang-Mo Kang; Chul-Koo Cho; In-Chul Park; Myung-Jin Park; Chang Hun Rhee; Seok-Il Hong; Hee Yong Chung; Yun-Sil Lee; Su-Jae Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Low doses of radiation increase the latency of spontaneous lymphomas and spinal osteosarcomas in cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel; J S Jackson; D P Morrison; S M Carlisle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Mechanisms of suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation.

Authors:  M C Pant; X-Y Liao; Q Lu; S Molloi; E Elmore; J L Redpath
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Lung cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with lung cancer mortality in the Atomic Bomb survivors study.

Authors:  G R Howe
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications.

Authors:  S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  14 in total

1.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Stochastic thresholds: a novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Alexander M Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis.

Authors:  Mohan Doss
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Low-dose-radiation stimulated natural chemical and biological protection against lung cancer.

Authors:  B R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Low-dose gamma-radiation inhibits benzo[a]pyrene-induced lung adenoma development in a/j mice.

Authors:  Veronica R Bruce; Steven A Belinsky; Katherine Gott; Yushi Liu; Thomas March; Bobby Scott; Julie Wilder
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  What physicians think about the need for informed consent for communicating the risk of cancer from low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Tijen Karsli; Mannudeep K Kalra; Julie L Self; Jason Anders Rosenfeld; Susan Butler; Stephen Simoneaux
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-06-26

Review 10.  REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE MECHANISTIC MODELS OF RADIATION-INDUCED NON-TARGETED EFFECTS (NTE).

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.