Literature DB >> 17973556

Detrimental and protective bystander effects: a model approach.

H Schöllnberger1, R E J Mitchel, J L Redpath, D J Crawford-Brown, W Hofmann.   

Abstract

This work integrates two important cellular responses to low doses, detrimental bystander effects and apoptosis-mediated protective bystander effects, into a multistage model for chromosome aberrations and in vitro neoplastic transformation: the State-Vector Model. The new models were tested on representative data sets that show supralinear or U-shaped dose responses. The original model without the new low-dose features was also tested for consistency with LNT-shaped dose responses. Reductions of in vitro neoplastic transformation frequencies below the spontaneous level have been reported after exposure of cells to low doses of low-LET radiation. In the current study, this protective effect is explained with bystander-induced apoptosis. An important data set that shows a low-dose detrimental bystander effect for chromosome aberrations was successfully fitted by additional terms within the cell initiation stage. It was found that this approach is equivalent to bystander-induced clonal expansion of initiated cells. This study is an important step toward a comprehensive model that contains all essential biological mechanisms that can influence dose-response curves at low doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17973556      PMCID: PMC3088356          DOI: 10.1667/rr0742.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  66 in total

1.  Application of Bayesian inference to characterize risks associated with low doses of low-LET radiation.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; B R Scott; T E Hanson
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Bystander-induced apoptosis and premature differentiation in primary urothelial explants after charged particle microbeam irradiation.

Authors:  O V Belyakov; M Folkard; C Mothersill; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

4.  Defective expression of the DNA mismatch repair protein, MLH1, alters G2-M cell cycle checkpoint arrest following ionizing radiation.

Authors:  T W Davis; C Wilson-Van Patten; M Meyers; K A Kunugi; S Cuthill; C Reznikoff; C Garces; C R Boland; T J Kinsella; R Fishel; D A Boothman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Radiation-induced adaptive response for protection against micronucleus formation and neoplastic transformation in C3H 10T1/2 mouse embryo cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; G P Raaphorst; R E Mitchel
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Cell-cell contact during gamma irradiation is not required to induce a bystander effect in normal human keratinocytes: evidence for release during irradiation of a signal controlling survival into the medium.

Authors:  C Mothersill; C B Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Mechanisms of suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation.

Authors:  M C Pant; X-Y Liao; Q Lu; S Molloi; E Elmore; J L Redpath
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Transforming growth factor beta-treated normal fibroblasts eliminate transformed fibroblasts by induction of apoptosis.

Authors:  J M Jürgensmeier; C P Schmitt; E Viesel; P Höfler; G Bauer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Low-LET-induced radioprotective mechanisms within a stochastic two-stage cancer model.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; R D Stewart; R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  Modeling cell response to low doses of photon irradiation: Part 2--application to radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in human carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Micaela Cunha; Etienne Testa; Olga V Komova; Elena A Nasonova; Larisa A Mel'nikova; Nina L Shmakova; Michaël Beuve
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Regulatory-Science: Biphasic Cancer Models or the LNT-Not Just a Matter of Biology!

Authors:  Paolo F Ricci; Ian R Sammis
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 5.  Systems biological and mechanistic modelling of radiation-induced cancer.

Authors:  M P Little; W F Heidenreich; S H Moolgavkar; H Schöllnberger; D C Thomas
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  "Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model"--HeLa x skin exposure to Cs not protective bystander response but mammogram and diagnostic X-rays are.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 7.  The cellular and molecular carcinogenic effects of radon exposure: a review.

Authors:  Aaron Robertson; James Allen; Robin Laney; Alison Curnow
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE MECHANISTIC MODELS OF RADIATION-INDUCED NON-TARGETED EFFECTS (NTE).

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Dynamics of cellular responses to radiation.

Authors:  Dominik Wodarz; Ron Sorace; Natalia L Komarova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.