Literature DB >> 33395702

REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE MECHANISTIC MODELS OF RADIATION-INDUCED NON-TARGETED EFFECTS (NTE).

Igor Shuryak1, David J Brenner1.   

Abstract

Quantitative mechanistic modeling of the biological effects of ionizing radiation has a long rich history. Initially, it was dominated by target theory, which quantifies damage caused by traversal of cellular targets like DNA by ionizing tracks. The discovery that mutagenesis, death and/or altered behavior sometimes occur in cells that were not themselves traversed by any radiation tracks but merely interacted with traversed cells was initially seen as surprising. As more evidence of such 'non-targeted' or 'bystander' effects accumulated, the importance of their contribution to radiation-induced damage became more recognized. Understanding and modeling these processes is important for quantifying and predicting radiation-induced health risks. Here we review the variety of mechanistic mathematical models of nontargeted effects that emerged over the past 2-3 decades. This review is not intended to be exhaustive, but focuses on the main assumptions and approaches shared or distinct between models, and on identifying areas for future research.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33395702      PMCID: PMC7840098          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncaa207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  79 in total

1.  A biological-based model that links genomic instability, bystander effects, and adaptive response.

Authors:  B R Scott
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Triggering-response model for radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Hatim Fakir; Werner Hofmann; Wai Y Tan; Rainer K Sachs
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Radiation-induced epigenetic bystander effects demonstrated in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Ting Wang; Shuyan Xu; Shaoxin Xu; Lijun Wu; Yuejin Wu; Po Bian
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  A cell-cell communication signal integrates quorum sensing and stress response.

Authors:  Jasmine Lee; Jien Wu; Yinyue Deng; Jing Wang; Chao Wang; Jianhe Wang; Changqing Chang; Yihu Dong; Paul Williams; Lian-Hui Zhang
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 5.  History of bystander effects research 1905-present; what is in a name?

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Andrej Rusin; Cristian Fernandez-Palomo; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 6.  Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect can be Transmitted Through Exosomes Using miRNAs as Effector Molecules.

Authors:  Yu Du; Shufang Du; Liu Liu; Feihong Gan; Xiaoge Jiang; Kaijuan Wangrao; Ping Lyu; Ping Gong; Yang Yao
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Microdosimetric model for the induction of cell killing through medium-borne signals.

Authors:  R D Stewart; R K Ratnayake; K Jennings
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Human Lung Cancer Risks from Radon - Part II - Influence from Combined Adaptive Response and Bystander Effects - A Microdose Analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Harderian Gland Tumorigenesis: Low-Dose and LET Response.

Authors:  Polly Y Chang; Francis A Cucinotta; Kathleen A Bjornstad; James Bakke; Chris J Rosen; Nicholas Du; David G Fairchild; Eliedonna Cacao; Eleanor A Blakely
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  A kinetic-based model of radiation-induced intercellular signalling.

Authors:  Stephen J McMahon; Karl T Butterworth; Colman Trainor; Conor K McGarry; Joe M O'Sullivan; Giuseppe Schettino; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reduced Environmental Dose Rates Are Responsible for the Increased Susceptibility to Radiation-Induced DNA Damage in Larval Neuroblasts of Drosophila Grown inside the LNGS Underground Laboratory.

Authors:  Antonella Porrazzo; Giuseppe Esposito; Daniela Grifoni; Giovanni Cenci; Patrizia Morciano; Maria Antonella Tabocchini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Quantitative modeling of multigenerational effects of chronic ionizing radiation using targeted and nontargeted effects.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; David J Brenner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Identification of a DNA damage repair gene-related signature for lung squamous cell carcinoma prognosis.

Authors:  Bin Jia; Ting Gong; Bingsheng Sun; Zhenfa Zhang; Diansheng Zhong; Changli Wang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Quantitative modeling of carcinogenesis induced by single beams or mixtures of space radiations using targeted and non-targeted effects.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.