Literature DB >> 19324806

Sexually antagonistic genetic variance for fitness in an ancestral and a novel environment.

Matthieu Delcourt1, Mark W Blows, Howard D Rundle.   

Abstract

The intersex genetic correlation for fitness , a standardized measure of the degree to which male and female fitness covary genetically, has consequences for important evolutionary processes, but few estimates are available and none have explored how it changes with environment. Using a half-sibling breeding design, we estimated the genetic (co)variance matrix (G) for male and female fitness, and the resulting , in Drosophila serrata. Our estimates were performed in two environments: the laboratory yeast food to which the population was well adapted and a novel corn food. The major axis of genetic variation for fitness in the two environments, accounting for 51.3 per cent of the total genetic variation, was significant and revealed a strong signal of sexual antagonism, loading negatively in both environments on males but positively on females. Consequently, estimates of were negative in both environments (-0.34 and -0.73, respectively), indicating that the majority of genetic variance segregating in this population has contrasting effects on male and female fitness. The possible strengthening of the negative in this novel environment may be a consequence of no history of selection for amelioration of sexual conflict. Additional studies from a diverse range of novel environments will be needed to determine the generality of this finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324806      PMCID: PMC2677236          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  27 in total

1.  Sex-limited mutations and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  T Rhen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment.

Authors:  Brett Holland
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G x E interactions.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.

Authors:  Howard D Rundle; Stephen F Chenoweth; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 8.  Sexual conflict and speciation.

Authors:  G A Parker; L Partridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Evolution of genetic variability in a spatially heterogeneous environment: effects of genotype-environment interaction.

Authors:  S Via; R Lande
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  25 in total

1.  Stable linkage disequilibrium owing to sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Francisco Ubeda; David Haig; Manus M Patten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolutionary optimum for male sexual traits characterized using the multivariate Robertson-Price Identity.

Authors:  Matthieu Delcourt; Mark W Blows; J David Aguirre; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparing the intersex genetic correlation for fitness across novel environments in the fruit fly, Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  D Punzalan; M Delcourt; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Plastic responses to novel environments are biased towards phenotype dimensions with high additive genetic variation.

Authors:  Daniel W A Noble; Reinder Radersma; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Debora Goedert; Miguel A Gómez-Llano; Foteini Spagopoulou; Angela Nava-Bolaños; Isobel Booksmythe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Female mating preferences determine system-level evolution in a gene network model.

Authors:  Janna L Fierst
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Physical and Linkage Maps for Drosophila serrata, a Model Species for Studies of Clinal Adaptation and Sexual Selection.

Authors:  Ann J Stocker; Bosco B Rusuwa; Mark J Blacket; Francesca D Frentiu; Mitchell Sullivan; Bradley R Foley; Scott Beatson; Ary A Hoffmann; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.