Literature DB >> 20031994

Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Göran Arnqvist1, Midori Tuda.   

Abstract

Although males and females share much of the same genome, selection is often distinct in the two sexes. Sexually antagonistic loci will in theory cause a gender load in populations, because sex-specific selection on a given trait in one sex will compromise the adaptive evolution of the same trait in the other sex. However, it is currently not clear whether such intralocus sexual conflict (ISC) represents a transient evolutionary state, where conflict is rapidly resolved by the evolution of sexual dimorphism (SD), or whether it is a more chronic impediment to adaptation. All else being equal, ISC should manifest itself as correlated evolution between population fitness and SD in traits expressed in both sexes. However, comparative tests of this prediction are problematic and have been unfeasible. Here, we assess the effects of ISC by comparing fitness and SD across distinct laboratory populations of seed beetles that should be well adapted to a shared environment. We show that SD in juvenile development time, a key life-history trait with a history of sexually antagonistic selection in this model system, is positively related to fitness. This effect is due to a correlated evolution between population fitness and development time that is positive in females but negative in males. Loosening the genetic bind between the sexes has evidently allowed the sexes to approach their distinct adaptive peaks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20031994      PMCID: PMC2871940          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  42 in total

1.  Sex-limited mutations and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  T Rhen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A brief history of R0 and a recipe for its calculation.

Authors:  J A P Heesterbeek
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.774

4.  Spontaneous mutational correlations for life-history, morphological and behavioral characters in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Beverly C Ajie; Michael Lynch; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Environmental effects on sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Sexual selection affects lifespan and aging in the seed beetle.

Authors:  Alexei A Maklakov; Claudia Fricke; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 9.304

Review 7.  Defining fitness in evolutionary models.

Authors:  Derek A Roff
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Genetic architecture of differences between populations of cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) evolved in the same environment.

Authors:  Jonas Bieri; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Single-generation estimates of individual fitness as proxies for long-term genetic contribution.

Authors:  Jon E Brommer; Lars Gustafsson; Hannu Pietiäinen; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  20 in total

1.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Female mating preferences determine system-level evolution in a gene network model.

Authors:  Janna L Fierst
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Meiotic drive reduces egg-to-adult viability in stalk-eyed flies.

Authors:  Sam Ronan Finnegan; Nathan Joseph White; Dixon Koh; M Florencia Camus; Kevin Fowler; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sexes suffer from suboptimal lifespan because of genetic conflict in a seed beetle.

Authors:  Elena C Berg; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sexual conflict and correlated evolution between male persistence and female resistance traits in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Emile van Lieshout; Kathryn B McNamara; Joe A Moschilla; Göran Arnqvist; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The influence of mitonuclear genetic variation on personality in seed beetles.

Authors:  Hanne Løvlie; Elina Immonen; Emil Gustavsson; Erem Kazancioğlu; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Larval competition reduces body condition in the female seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  Daynika J Schade; Steven M Vamosi
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Within-species divergence in the seminal fluid proteome and its effect on male and female reproduction in a beetle.

Authors:  Julieta Goenaga; Takashi Yamane; Johanna Rönn; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  A Paradox of Genetic Variance in Epigamic Traits: Beyond "Good Genes" View of Sexual Selection.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan; Leif Engqvist; Klaus Reinhold
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.