Literature DB >> 23584953

Female mating preferences determine system-level evolution in a gene network model.

Janna L Fierst1.   

Abstract

Environmental patterns of directional, stabilizing and fluctuating selection can influence the evolution of system-level properties like evolvability and mutational robustness. Intersexual selection produces strong phenotypic selection and these dynamics may also affect the response to mutation and the potential for future adaptation. In order to to assess the influence of mating preferences on these evolutionary properties, I modeled a male trait and female preference determined by separate gene regulatory networks. I studied three sexual selection scenarios: sexual conflict, a Gaussian model of the Fisher process described in Lande (in Proc Natl Acad Sci 78(6):3721-3725, 1981) and a good genes model in which the male trait signalled his mutational condition. I measured the effects these mating preferences had on the potential for traits and preferences to evolve towards new states, and mutational robustness of both the phenotype and the individual's overall viability. All types of sexual selection increased male phenotypic robustness relative to a randomly mating population. The Fisher model also reduced male evolvability and mutational robustness for viability. Under good genes sexual selection, males evolved an increased mutational robustness for viability. Females choosing their mates is a scenario that is sufficient to create selective forces that impact genetic evolution and shape the evolutionary response to mutation and environmental selection. These dynamics will inevitably develop in any population where sexual selection is operating, and affect the potential for future adaptation.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584953     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-013-9714-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  60 in total

1.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The limits of sexual conflict in the narrow sense: new insights from waterfowl biology.

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller; David Houle; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae).

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Intralocus sexual conflict over immune defense, gender load, and sex-specific signaling in a natural lizard population.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Andrew G McAdam; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  DOES EVOLUTIONARY PLASTICITY EVOLVE?

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Adaptation.

Authors:  R C Lewontin
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.142

10.  The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pattern of mating preference of interspecific hybrid females and phylogeny in the Drosophila bipectinata species complex.

Authors:  P Banerjee; B N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Sexual selection contributes to partial restoration of phenotypic robustness in a butterfly.

Authors:  Caroline M Nieberding; Gilles San Martin; Suzanne Saenko; Cerisse E Allen; Paul M Brakefield; Bertanne Visser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.