Literature DB >> 20861051

Stable linkage disequilibrium owing to sexual antagonism.

Francisco Ubeda1, David Haig, Manus M Patten.   

Abstract

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) is an association between genetic loci that is typically transient. Here, we identify a previously overlooked cause of stable LD that may be pervasive: sexual antagonism. This form of selection produces unequal allele frequencies in males and females each generation, which upon admixture at fertilization give rise to an excess of haplotypes that couple male-beneficial with male-beneficial and female-beneficial with female-beneficial alleles. Under sexual antagonism, LD is obtained for all recombination frequencies in the absence of epistasis. The extent of LD is highest at low recombination and for stronger selection. We provide a partition of the total LD into distinct components and compare our result for sexual antagonism with Li and Nei's model of LD owing to population subdivision. Given the frequent observation of sexually antagonistic selection in natural populations and the number of traits that are often involved, these results suggest a major contribution of sexual antagonism to genomic structure.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20861051      PMCID: PMC3049042          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  General two-locus selection models: some objectives, results and interpretations.

Authors:  S Karlin
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male-limited evolution.

Authors:  N G Prasad; S Bedhomme; T Day; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes under random mating.

Authors:  J F Kidwell; M T Clegg; F M Stewart; T Prout
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Paolo Innocenti; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 7.  Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer.

Authors:  Katharina Foerster; Tim Coulson; Ben C Sheldon; Josephine M Pemberton; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Sexually antagonistic genetic variance for fitness in an ancestral and a novel environment.

Authors:  Matthieu Delcourt; Mark W Blows; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The intersexual genetic correlation for lifetime fitness in the wild and its implications for sexual selection.

Authors:  Jon E Brommer; Mark Kirkpatrick; Anna Qvarnström; Lars Gustafsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sexual antagonism drives the displacement of polymorphism across gene regulatory cascades.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Max Reuter; Alexander J Stewart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Specialists and generalists: the sexual ecology of the genome.

Authors:  David Haig; Francisco Úbeda; Manus M Patten
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Interlocus sexually antagonistic coevolution can create indirect selection for increased recombination.

Authors:  Amy L Dapper; Curtis M Lively
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Testing for the footprint of sexually antagonistic polymorphisms in the pseudoautosomal region of a plant sex chromosome pair.

Authors:  Suo Qiu; Roberta Bergero; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The effect of epistasis on sexually antagonistic genetic variation.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Nikolas Vellnow; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.