Literature DB >> 10937181

Sex-limited mutations and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

T Rhen1.   

Abstract

Although the developmental and genetic mechanisms underlying sex differences are being elucidated in great detail in a number of species, there remains a breach between proximate and evolutionary studies of sexual dimorphism. More precisely, the evolution of sex-limited gene expression at autosomal loci has not been well reasoned using either theoretical or empirical methods. Here, I show that a Mendelian genetic model including elementary details of sexual differentiation provides novel insight into the evolution of sex differences via sex limitation. This model indicates that the nature of allelic effects and the pattern of selection must be known in both sexes to predict the evolution of sex differences. That is, selection interacts with genetic variation for sexual dimorphism to produce unanticipated patterns of trait divergence or convergence between the sexes. Ultimately, this model may explain why previous models for the evolution of sexual dimorphism do not predict the erratic behavior of the sex difference during artificial selection experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937181     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  25 in total

1.  Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; Michael D Jennions; Josephine Morley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Potential constraints on evolution: sexual dimorphism and the problem of protandry in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  Bas J Zwaan; Wilte G Zijlstra; Marieke Keller; Jeroen Pijpe; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Adult locomotory activity mediates intralocus sexual conflict in a laboratory-adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Debora Goedert; Miguel A Gómez-Llano; Foteini Spagopoulou; Angela Nava-Bolaños; Isobel Booksmythe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Size-dependent response to conspecific mating calls by male crickets.

Authors:  M Kiflawi; D A Gray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Dorian G Mitchem; Alicia M Purkey; Nicholas M Grebe; Gregory Carey; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Timothy C Bates; Rosalind Arden; John K Hewitt; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Brendan P Zietsch; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.