Literature DB >> 19321587

Various doses of soy isoflavones do not modify mammographic density in postmenopausal women.

Gertraud Maskarinec1, Martijn Verheus, Francene M Steinberg, Paula Amato, Margaret K Cramer, Richard D Lewis, Michael J Murray, Ronald L Young, William W Wong.   

Abstract

Soy isoflavones have functional similarity to human estrogens and may protect against breast cancer as a result of their antiestrogenic activity or increase risk as a result of their estrogen-like properties. We examined the relation between isoflavone supplementation and mammographic density, a strong marker for breast cancer risk, among postmenopausal women. The Osteoporosis Prevention Using Soy (OPUS) study, a multi-site, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial assigned 406 postmenopausal women to 80 or 120 mg/d of isoflavones each or a placebo for 2 y. Percent densities were assessed in digitized mammograms using a computer-assisted method. The mammogram reader did not know the treatment status and the time of mammograms. We applied mixed models to compare breast density by treatment while considering the repeated measures. The mammographic density analysis included 358 women, 88.2% of the OPUS participants; 303 had a complete set of 3 mammograms, 49 had 2, and 6 had only 1 mammogram. At baseline, the groups were similar in age, BMI, and percent density, but mean breast density differed by study site (P = 0.02). A model with all mammograms did not show a treatment effect on any mammographic measure, but the change over time was significant; breast density decreased by 1.6%/y across groups (P < 0.001). Stratification by age and BMI did not reveal any effects in subgroups. In this randomized 2-y trial, isoflavone supplements did not modify breast density in postmenopausal women. These findings offer reassurance that isoflavones do not act like hormone replacement medication on breast density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19321587      PMCID: PMC2714394          DOI: 10.3945/jn.108.102913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  33 in total

1.  Validation of a soy food-frequency questionnaire and evaluation of correlates of plasma isoflavone concentrations in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Cara L Frankenfeld; Ruth E Patterson; Neilann K Horner; Marian L Neuhouser; Heather E Skor; Thomas F Kalhorn; William N Howald; Johanna W Lampe
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Soyfood intake during adolescence and subsequent risk of breast cancer among Chinese women.

Authors:  X O Shu; F Jin; Q Dai; W Wen; J D Potter; L H Kushi; Z Ruan; Y T Gao; W Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Helen Guo; Anna Chiarelli; Greg Hislop; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Stimulatory influence of soy protein isolate on breast secretion in pre- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  N L Petrakis; S Barnes; E B King; J Lowenstein; J Wiencke; M M Lee; R Miike; M Kirk; L Coward
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Rulla M Tamimi; Susan E Hankinson; Graham A Colditz; Celia Byrne
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens; Kelly Vogt; Vivian Lee; John L Hopper; Martin J Yaffe; Andrew D Paterson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Two-week dietary soy supplementation has an estrogenic effect on normal premenopausal breast.

Authors:  D F Hargreaves; C S Potten; C Harding; L E Shaw; M S Morton; S A Roberts; A Howell; N J Bundred
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Mammographic density as a surrogate marker for the effects of hormone therapy on risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Qing Li; Limei Sun; Anna M Chiarelli; Greg Hislop; Martin J Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  A 2-year soy intervention in premenopausal women does not change mammographic densities.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Yumie Takata; Adrian A Franke; Andrew E Williams; Suzanne P Murphy
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study.

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; V Shane Pankratz; Thomas A Sellers; Kathy R Brandt; Alice Wang; Carol Janney; Zachary S Fredericksen; James R Cerhan; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  17 in total

1.  Double-Blind Randomized 12-Month Soy Intervention Had No Effects on Breast MRI Fibroglandular Tissue Density or Mammographic Density.

Authors:  Anna H Wu; Darcy Spicer; Agustin Garcia; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Linda Hovanessian-Larsen; Pulin Sheth; Sue Ellen Martin; Debra Hawes; Christy Russell; Heather MacDonald; Debu Tripathy; Min-Ying Su; Giske Ursin; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-08-14

2.  Cytology in nipple aspirate fluid during a randomized soy food intervention among premenopausal women.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Shana Suzuki; Ian S Pagano; Yukiko Morimoto; Adrian A Franke; Hormoz Ehya
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.900

3.  Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Effect of Soy and Soy Isoflavones on Obesity-Related Anthropometric Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Masoumeh Akhlaghi; Morteza Zare; Fatemeh Nouripour
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  Clinical outcomes of a 2-y soy isoflavone supplementation in menopausal women.

Authors:  Francene M Steinberg; Michael J Murray; Richard D Lewis; Margaret A Cramer; Paula Amato; Ronald L Young; Stephen Barnes; Karen L Konzelmann; Joan G Fischer; Kenneth J Ellis; Roman J Shypailo; J Kennard Fraley; E O'Brian Smith; William W Wong
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  Is soy consumption good or bad for the breast?

Authors:  Leena Hilakivi-Clarke; Juan E Andrade; William Helferich
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  The volume of nipple aspirate fluid is not affected by 6 months of treatment with soy foods in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Yukiko Morimoto; Shannon M Conroy; Ian S Pagano; Adrian A Franke
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Isoflavonoids - an overview of their biological activities and potential health benefits.

Authors:  Eva Miadoková
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2009-12-28

Review 9.  Effects of isoflavones on breast density in pre- and post-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lee Hooper; Giri Madhavan; Jeffrey A Tice; Sam J Leinster; Aedín Cassidy
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Relationship Between Breast Density and Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators, Aromatase Inhibitors, Physical Activity, and Diet: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.