Literature DB >> 26276750

Double-Blind Randomized 12-Month Soy Intervention Had No Effects on Breast MRI Fibroglandular Tissue Density or Mammographic Density.

Anna H Wu1, Darcy Spicer2, Agustin Garcia3, Chiu-Chen Tseng4, Linda Hovanessian-Larsen5, Pulin Sheth5, Sue Ellen Martin6, Debra Hawes6, Christy Russell2, Heather MacDonald2, Debu Tripathy7, Min-Ying Su8, Giske Ursin9, Malcolm C Pike10.   

Abstract

Soy supplementation by patients with breast cancer remains controversial. No controlled intervention studies have investigated the effects of soy supplementation on mammographic density in patients with breast cancer. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled intervention study in previously treated patients with breast cancer (n = 66) and high-risk women (n = 29). We obtained digital mammograms and breast MRI scans at baseline and after 12 months of daily soy (50 mg isoflavones per day; n = 46) or placebo (n = 49) tablet supplementation. The total breast area (MA) and the area of mammographic density (MD) on the mammogram were measured using a validated computer-assisted method, and mammographic density percent (MD% = 100 × MD/MA) was determined. A well-tested computer algorithm was used to quantitatively measure the total breast volume (TBV) and fibroglandular tissue volume (FGV) on the breast MRI, and the FGV percent (FGV% = 100 × FGV/TBV) was calculated. On the basis of plasma soy isoflavone levels, compliance was excellent. Small decreases in MD% measured by the ratios of month 12 to baseline levels were seen in the soy (0.95) and the placebo (0.87) groups; these changes did not differ between the treatments (P = 0.38). Small decreases in FGV% were also found in both the soy (0.90) and the placebo (0.92) groups; these changes also did not differ between the treatments (P = 0.48). Results were comparable in patients with breast cancer and high-risk women. We found no evidence that soy supplementation would decrease mammographic density and that MRI might be more sensitive to changes in density than mammography. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26276750      PMCID: PMC4596769          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  54 in total

1.  A controlled 2-mo dietary fat reduction and soy food supplementation study in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Anna H Wu; Frank Z Stanczyk; Carmen Martinez; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Suzanne Hendrich; Patricia Murphy; Sukanya Chaikittisilpa; Daniel O Stram; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Differences in measured mammographic density in the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Gayane Hovhannisyan; Lorraine Chow; Alexandra Schlosser; Martin J Yaffe; Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Quantitative analysis of breast parenchymal patterns using 3D fibroglandular tissues segmented based on MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Daniel Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Effect of 2-month controlled green tea intervention on lipoprotein cholesterol, glucose, and hormone levels in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Anna H Wu; Darcy Spicer; Frank Z Stanczyk; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Chung S Yang; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-01-13

5.  Two-week dietary soy supplementation has an estrogenic effect on normal premenopausal breast.

Authors:  D F Hargreaves; C S Potten; C Harding; L E Shaw; M S Morton; S A Roberts; A Howell; N J Bundred
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies.

Authors:  T Key; P Appleby; I Barnes; G Reeves
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Various doses of soy isoflavones do not modify mammographic density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Martijn Verheus; Francene M Steinberg; Paula Amato; Margaret K Cramer; Richard D Lewis; Michael J Murray; Ronald L Young; William W Wong
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 8.  Soy, red clover, and isoflavones and breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Heidi Fritz; Dugald Seely; Gillian Flower; Becky Skidmore; Rochelle Fernandes; Sarah Vadeboncoeur; Deborah Kennedy; Kieran Cooley; Raimond Wong; Stephen Sagar; Elham Sabri; Dean Fergusson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.

Authors:  Jeff Wang; Ania Azziz; Bo Fan; Serghei Malkov; Catherine Klifa; David Newitt; Silaja Yitta; Nola Hylton; Karla Kerlikowske; John A Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Effects of isoflavones on breast tissue and the thyroid hormone system in humans: a comprehensive safety evaluation.

Authors:  S Hüser; S Guth; H G Joost; S T Soukup; J Köhrle; L Kreienbrock; P Diel; D W Lachenmeier; G Eisenbrand; G Vollmer; U Nöthlings; D Marko; A Mally; T Grune; L Lehmann; P Steinberg; S E Kulling
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  The "Gut Feeling": Breaking Down the Role of Gut Microbiome in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Samantha N Freedman; Shailesh K Shahi; Ashutosh K Mangalam
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  In vitro-in silico-based analysis of the dose-dependent in vivo oestrogenicity of the soy phytoestrogen genistein in humans.

Authors:  Rungnapa Boonpawa; Albertus Spenkelink; Ans Punt; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Does soy protein affect circulating levels of unbound IGF-1?

Authors:  Mark Messina; Pamela Magee
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 5.  Microbial monotherapy with Prevotella histicola for patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ashutosh K Mangalam; Joseph Murray
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.618

6.  Impact of 18-Month Soy Protein Supplementation on Steroid Hormones and Serum Biomarkers of Angiogenesis, Apoptosis, and the Growth Hormone/IGF-1 Axis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Males Following Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Maarten C Bosland; Jonathan Huang; Michael J Schlicht; Erika Enk; Hui Xie; Ikuko Kato
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 7.  Soy and Health Update: Evaluation of the Clinical and Epidemiologic Literature.

Authors:  Mark Messina
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Soy, Soy Foods and Their Role in Vegetarian Diets.

Authors:  Gianluca Rizzo; Luciana Baroni
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Breast Cancer Prevention-Is there a Future for Sulforaphane and Its Analogs?

Authors:  Dominika Kuran; Anna Pogorzelska; Katarzyna Wiktorska
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Therapeutic Effects of Dietary Soybean Genistein on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer via Regulation of Epigenetic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Manvi Sharma; Itika Arora; Min Chen; Huixin Wu; Michael R Crowley; Trygve O Tollefsbol; Yuanyuan Li
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.