Literature DB >> 18385204

Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study.

Linda E Kelemen1, V Shane Pankratz, Thomas A Sellers, Kathy R Brandt, Alice Wang, Carol Janney, Zachary S Fredericksen, James R Cerhan, Celine M Vachon.   

Abstract

Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, yet few studies have evaluated density trends, and associated factors, over time. The authors retrieved and digitized mammograms (> or =1 per woman) imaged in 1990-2003 to evaluate percent density (PD) in the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family cohort. Multivariable-adjusted, mixed-effects, repeated-measures models incorporating a natural cubic spline provided estimates of nonlinear trends in PD with age and were used to examine association with covariates. Overall, 5,698 mammograms from 1,689 women with covariate information were digitized. In descriptive analyses, the highest median PD was 33.1% (interquartile range, 21.8%; n = 230) among premenopausal women, 31.0% (interquartile range, 23.2%; n = 175) among women who transitioned from pre- to postmenopause, and 18.7% (interquartile range, 22.2%; n = 1,284) among postmenopausal women. On average, premenopausal compared with postmenopausal women had 1.9% (p = 0.001) higher PD. In repeated-measures analyses, greater declines in PD occurred with menopause and among women with higher baseline PD; current postmenopausal hormone use and higher body mass index modified these declines (p interaction < 0.001). No significant modification of the density change with age was seen with parity/age at first birth, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, family history of breast or ovarian cancer in a first- or second-degree relative, educational level, smoking status, or alcohol intake were observed. These data suggest that menopause, baseline PD, postmenopausal hormone use, and body mass index predict changes in mammographic density trends during adult life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18385204     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  38 in total

1.  The effect of change in body mass index on volumetric measures of mammographic density.

Authors:  Vicki Hart; Katherine W Reeves; Susan R Sturgeon; Nicholas G Reich; Lynnette Leidy Sievert; Karla Kerlikowske; Lin Ma; John Shepherd; Jeffrey A Tice; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Serghei Malkov; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Breast density, body mass index, and risk of tumor marker-defined subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Diana S M Buist; Kathleen E Malone; William E Barlow; Peggy L Porter; Karla Kerlikowske; Ellen S O'Meara; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 3.  Physical activity and mammographic breast density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Kathleen Wolin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Longitudinal Study of Mammographic Density Measures That Predict Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Kavitha Krishnan; Laura Baglietto; Jennifer Stone; Julie A Simpson; Gianluca Severi; Christopher F Evans; Robert J MacInnis; Graham G Giles; Carmel Apicella; John L Hopper
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Physical activity and change in mammographic density: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Shannon M Conroy; Lesley M Butler; Danielle Harvey; Ellen B Gold; Barbara Sternfeld; Nina Oestreicher; Gail A Greendale; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Longitudinal Changes in Volumetric Breast Density in Healthy Women across the Menopausal Transition.

Authors:  Natalie J Engmann; Christopher Scott; Matthew R Jensen; Stacey J Winham; Lin Ma; Kathleen R Brandt; Amir Mahmoudzadeh; Dana H Whaley; Carrie B Hruska; Fang-Fang Wu; Aaron D Norman; Robert A Hiatt; John Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Mammographic breast density and tolerance for short-term postmenopausal hormone therapy suspension.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Melissa L Anderson; Susan D Reed; Katherine M Newton; E Dawn Fitzgibbons; Deborah Seger; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Green Tea Extract Supplementation and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hamed Samavat; Giske Ursin; Tim H Emory; Eunjung Lee; Renwei Wang; Carolyn J Torkelson; Allison M Dostal; Karen Swenson; Chap T Le; Chung S Yang; Mimi C Yu; Douglas Yee; Anna H Wu; Jian-Min Yuan; Mindy S Kurzer
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-09-13

9.  Independent association of lobular involution and mammographic breast density with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Celine M Vachon; V Shane Pankratz; Robert A Vierkant; Stephanie S Anderson; Kathleen R Brandt; Daniel W Visscher; Carol Reynolds; Marlene H Frost; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast Density.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Brad M Keller; Lauren M Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Marie Synnestvedt; Emily F Conant; Katrina Armstrong; Despina Kontos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.