Literature DB >> 27130722

Relationship Between Breast Density and Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators, Aromatase Inhibitors, Physical Activity, and Diet: A Systematic Review.

Ernest U Ekpo1, Patrick C Brennan2, Claudia Mello-Thoms2, Mark F McEntee2.   

Abstract

Background Lower breast density (BD) is associated with lower risk of breast cancer and may serve as a biomarker for the efficacy of chemopreventive strategies. This review explores parameters that are thought to be associated with lower BD. We conducted a systematic review of articles published to date using the PRISMA strategy. Articles that assessed change in BD with estrogen-receptor modulators (tamoxifene [TAM], raloxifene [RLX], and tibolone) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), as well as cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (LSs) that assessed association between BD and physical activity (PA) or diet were reviewed. Results Ten studies assessed change in BD with TAM; all reported TAM-mediated BD decreases. Change in BD with RLX was assessed by 11 studies; 3 reported a reduction in BD. Effect of tibolone was assessed by 5 RCTs; only 1 reported change in BD. AI-mediated BD reduction was reported by 3 out of 10 studies. The association between PA and BD was assessed by 21 studies; 4 reported an inverse association. The relationship between diet and BD was assessed in 34 studies. All studies on calcium and vitamin D as well as vegetable intake reported an inverse association with BD in premenopausal women. Two RCTs demonstrated BD reduction with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate intervention. Conclusion TAM induces BD reduction; however, the effect of RLX, tibolone, and AIs on BD is unclear. Although data on association between diet and BD in adulthood are contradictory, intake of vegetables, vitamin D, and calcium appear to be associated with lower BD in premenopausal women.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anastrozole; exercise; letrozole; raloxifene; tamoxifene; tibolone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27130722      PMCID: PMC5736059          DOI: 10.1177/1534735416628343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1534-7354            Impact factor:   3.279


  108 in total

1.  Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen.

Authors:  C Atkinson; R Warren; S A Bingham; N E Day
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  [Effect of beta-carotene on gene expression of breast cancer cells].

Authors:  Zhong Li; Chun-Yan Hu; Bao-Qing Mo; Ji-Da Xu; Yan Zhao
Journal:  Ai Zheng       Date:  2003-04

3.  Does raloxifene therapy affect mammographic breast cancer screening in postmenopausal patients?

Authors:  T Cirpan; F Akercan; I M Itil; G Gundem; I Bilgen; M S Yucebilgin
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.196

4.  No association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D and mammographic density.

Authors:  Julia A Knight; Celine M Vachon; Robert A Vierkant; Reinhold Vieth; James R Cerhan; Thomas A Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns, hormone replacement therapy and other risk factors: a case-control study.

Authors:  E Sala; R Warren; J McCann; S Duffy; R Luben; N Day
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  A pilot study of letrozole for one year in women at enhanced risk of developing breast cancer: effects on mammographic density.

Authors:  Julia Smith; Asma Dilawari; Giske Ursin; Eleni Andreopoulou; Christina Checka; Deborah Axelrod; Amber Guth; Hildegard Toth; Minerva Utate; Karen Carapetyan; Elsa Reich; Thomas Diflo; Franco Muggia
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Macronutrient intake and change in mammographic density at menopause: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  J A Knight; L J Martin; C V Greenberg; G A Lockwood; J W Byng; M J Yaffe; D L Tritchler; N F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Various doses of soy isoflavones do not modify mammographic density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Martijn Verheus; Francene M Steinberg; Paula Amato; Margaret K Cramer; Richard D Lewis; Michael J Murray; Ronald L Young; William W Wong
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Recreational physical activity and mammographic breast density characteristics.

Authors:  Katherine W Reeves; Gretchen L Gierach; Francesmary Modugno
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Dietary calcium and vitamin D intakes in childhood and throughout adulthood and mammographic density in a British birth cohort.

Authors:  G Mishra; V McCormack; D Kuh; R Hardy; A Stephen; I dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic density, endocrine therapy and breast cancer risk: a prognostic and predictive biomarker review.

Authors:  Emma C Atakpa; Mangesh A Thorat; Jack Cuzick; Adam R Brentnall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-26

2.  Factors Influencing Mammographic Density in Asian Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the Northeast Region of Peninsular Malaysia.

Authors:  Tengku Muhammad Hanis; Wan Nor Arifin; Juhara Haron; Wan Faiziah Wan Abdul Rahman; Nur Intan Raihana Ruhaiyem; Rosni Abdullah; Kamarul Imran Musa
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 3.  Qualitative Versus Quantitative Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: Applications for the US and Abroad.

Authors:  Stamatia Destounis; Andrea Arieno; Renee Morgan; Christina Roberts; Ariane Chan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-31

4.  Breast Cancer in Australian Indigenous Women: Incidence,zzm321990Mortality, and Risk Factors

Authors:  Kriscia A Tapia; Gail Garvey; Mark Mc Entee; Mary Rickard; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and breast composition in a longitudinal study of Chilean girls.

Authors:  Lara Yoon; Camila Corvalán; Ana Pereira; John Shepherd; Karin B Michels
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Sulindac, a Nonselective NSAID, Reduces Breast Density in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Patricia A Thompson; Chuan Huang; Jie Yang; Betsy C Wertheim; Denise Roe; Xiaoyue Zhang; Jie Ding; Pavani Chalasani; Christina Preece; Jessica Martinez; H-H Sherry Chow; Alison T Stopeck
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone

Authors:  Ernest Usang Ekpo; Maram Alakhras; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26

8.  Impact of hormonal therapy and other adjuvant therapies on contralateral breast volume change after implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jung Youl Park; Jae-Ho Chung; Hyung Chul Lee; Byung-Il Lee; Seung-Ha Park; Eul-Sik Yoon
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-09-15

9.  Mammographic Density Distribution in Ras Al Khaimah (RAK): Relationships with Demographic and Reproductive Factors

Authors:  Salman M Albeshan; Syeda Z Hossain; Martin G Mackey; Delgermaa Demchig; Jennifer K Peat; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-06-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.