Literature DB >> 16702377

Mammographic density as a surrogate marker for the effects of hormone therapy on risk of breast cancer.

Norman F Boyd1, Lisa J Martin, Qing Li, Limei Sun, Anna M Chiarelli, Greg Hislop, Martin J Yaffe, Salomon Minkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some types of hormone therapy increase both risk of breast cancer and mammographic density, a risk factor for the disease, suggesting that mammographic density may be a surrogate marker for the effects of hormones on risk of breast cancer. This research was undertaken to determine whether the effect of hormone therapy on breast cancer risk is mediated by its effect on mammographic density.
METHODS: Individually matched cases and controls from three nested case-control studies in breast screening populations were studied. Cases had developed invasive breast cancer at least 12 months after the initial screen. Information was collected on hormone use and other risk factors at the time of the baseline mammogram, and percent density was measured by a computer-assisted method.
RESULTS: There were 1,748 postmenopausal women, of whom 426 (24.4%) were using hormones at the time of their initial screening mammogram. Current use of hormone therapy was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.6) that was little changed by adjustment for percent density in the baseline mammogram (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.5). Percent density in the baseline mammogram was among cases greater in current users of hormones that in never-users (difference = 5.0%, P < 0.001), but the difference was smaller and nonsignificant in controls (difference = 1.6%, P = 0.3).
CONCLUSION: Although the effects of hormone therapy on mammographic density were greater in cases than controls, we did not find evidence that these effects were causally related to risk of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16702377     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  28 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Andrea J Cook; Diana S M Buist; Steve R Cummings; Celine Vachon; Pamela Vacek; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Mammographic density change with 1 year of aerobic exercise among postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christy G Woolcott; Kerry S Courneya; Norman F Boyd; Martin J Yaffe; Tim Terry; Anne McTiernan; Rollin Brant; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Melinda L Irwin; Charlotte A Jones; Sony Brar; Kristin L Campbell; Margaret L McNeely; Kristina H Karvinen; Christine M Friedenreich
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Association of Interactions Between Mammographic Density Phenotypes and Established Risk Factors With Breast Cancer Risk, by Tumor Subtype and Menopausal Status.

Authors:  Hongjie Chen; Lusine Yaghjyan; Christopher Li; Ulrike Peters; Bernard Rosner; Sara Lindström; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Justin L Ducote; Huanjun Ding; Stephen A Feig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk by menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use and a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Circulating sex hormones and mammographic breast density among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Ronald E Gangnon; Diana S M Buist; Elizabeth S Burnside; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Frank Z Stanczyk; Gale S Sisney
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.869

8.  Red versus white wine as a nutritional aromatase inhibitor in premenopausal women: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chrisandra Shufelt; C Noel Bairey Merz; YuChing Yang; Joan Kirschner; Donna Polk; Frank Stanczyk; Maura Paul-Labrador; Glenn D Braunstein
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Bi-directional signaling: extracellular matrix and integrin regulation of breast tumor progression.

Authors:  Scott Gehler; Suzanne M Ponik; Kristin M Riching; Patricia J Keely
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.807

10.  Digital histologic analysis reveals morphometric patterns of age-related involution in breast epithelium and stroma.

Authors:  Rupninder Sandhu; Lynn Chollet-Hinton; Erin L Kirk; Bentley Midkiff; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.