Literature DB >> 19271887

Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics.

Min-Suk Kang1.   

Abstract

W.J.M. Levelt systematized the influence of stimulus strength on binocular rivalry dynamics in several formal propositions. His counterintuitive 2nd proposition states that mean dominance duration of one eye's stimulus depends not on the strength of that stimulus but, instead, on the strength of the stimulus viewed by the other eye. Some studies have reported results consistent with this proposition but others have found violations of the proposition. This paper examines the dynamics of binocular rivalry by changing the size of rival stimuli and the tracking instructions during rivalry tracking periods in which the contrasts of the two rival stimuli are varied independently. Levelt's 2nd proposition was validated when those stimuli were large, but it was violated when the rival stimuli were small, suggesting that the dynamics of binocular rivalry are spatiotemporal in nature. A simple energy model with coupling among neighboring areas of rivalry can account for these findings. Other dynamics depending on the size of rival stimuli are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271887      PMCID: PMC2655326          DOI: 10.1167/9.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  27 in total

1.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  R Blake; R P O'Shea; T J Mueller
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  The effect of spatial frequency and field size on the spread of exclusive visibility in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R P O'Shea; A J Sims; D G Govan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  T J Mueller; R Blake
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-01-23       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  A test of Levelt's second proposition for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  C J Bossink; P F Stalmeier; C M De Weert
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  13 in total

1.  Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeffrey Seely; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry by collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Sang-Hun Lee; June Kim; David Heeger; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; Asya Shpiro; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Perceptual, cognitive, and personality rigidity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Mirella Díaz-Santos; Bo Cao; Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Daniel J Norton; Sandy Neargarder; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Periodic perturbations producing phase-locked fluctuations in visual perception.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; David Heeger; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  An integrated framework of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Competition with and without priority control: linking rivalry to attention through winner-take-all networks with memory.

Authors:  Svenja Marx; Gina Gruenhage; Daniel Walper; Ueli Rutishauser; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Personality Measures Link Slower Binocular Rivalry Switch Rates to Higher Levels of Self-Discipline.

Authors:  Anna Antinori; Luke D Smillie; Olivia L Carter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-05

10.  Binocular rivalry reveals an out-of-equilibrium neural dynamics suited for decision-making.

Authors:  Maurizio Mattia; Jochen Braun; Robin Cao; Alexander Pastukhov; Stepan Aleshin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.