Literature DB >> 2765591

A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

T J Mueller1, R Blake.   

Abstract

Human observers viewed dichoptic orthogonal sine-wave gratings and indicated when exclusive visibility occurred in either eye. Contrast was held constant in one eye and was increased or decreased in the other eye for a number of alternation cycles (continuous presentation) or for only the duration of a single period of exclusive visibility (synchronous presentation). The synchronous presentation condition allowed us to identify the differing effects of contrast during the suppressed and during the dominant periods. Mixed phases were recorded as distinct from suppressed and dominant phases, and new classifications of compound-dominant and compound-suppressed phases are defined. The results indicate that binocular rivalry responds to stimulus contrast in two ways. 1) The duty-cycle of dominance and suppression is determined by the relative image contrast between the two eyes, with dominance of the higher contrast image being favored, and 2) the overall rate of alternation is driven by monocular image contrast during the suppressed phase (increased monocular contrast increases the alternation rate) and to a lesser extent by monocular contrast during the dominant phase (increased monocular contrast decreases the rate). A model is developed to reflect these ideas. These results support a reciprocal inhibition oscillator as the underlying mechanism of binocular rivalry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2765591     DOI: 10.1007/BF00198769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  7 in total

1.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision.

Authors:  C WHEATSTONE
Journal:  Optom Wkly       Date:  1962-11-22

2.  Threshold conditions for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R Blake
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The dynamic model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  K Matsuoka
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Neural models of brightness perception and retinal rivalry in binocular vision.

Authors:  N Sugie
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  M Hollins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06

7.  Method for measuring strength of suppression in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  T Sohmiya; K Sohmiya
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1985-12
  7 in total
  34 in total

Review 1.  A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Carlo R Laing; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND NEURAL DYNAMICS.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Sang-Hun Lee; David Heeger
Journal:  Psichologija (Vilniaus Univ)       Date:  2008-06-01

4.  Mechanisms for Frequency Control in Neuronal Competition Models.

Authors:  Rodica Curtu; Asya Shpiro; Nava Rubin; John Rinzel
Journal:  SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Klaus Wunderlich; Keith A Schneider; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-23       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  MEG phase follows conscious perception during binocular rivalry induced by visual stream segregation.

Authors:  Ramesh Srinivasan; Sanja Petrovic
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models.

Authors:  Asya Shpiro; Rodica Curtu; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on initial ocular following responses.

Authors:  Mingxia Zhu; Richard W Hertle; Chang H Kim; Xuefeng Shi; Dongsheng Yang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.