Literature DB >> 19271918

Periodic perturbations producing phase-locked fluctuations in visual perception.

Min-Suk Kang1, David Heeger, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

This paper describes a novel psychophysical and analytical technique, called periodic perturbation, for creating and characterizing perceptual waves associated with transitions in visibility of a stimulus during binocular rivalry and during binocular fusion. Observers tracked rivalry within a small, central region of spatially extended rival targets while small, brief increments in contrast ("triggers") were presented repetitively in antiphase within different regions of the two rival targets. Appropriately timed triggers produced entrainment of rivalry alternations within the central region, with the optimal timing dependent on an observer's native alternation rate. The latency between trigger and state switch increased with the distance between the location of the trigger and the central region being monitored, providing evidence for traveling waves of dominance. Traveling waves produced by periodic perturbation exhibited the same characteristics as those generated using a less efficient, more demanding discrete trial technique. We used periodic perturbation to reveal a novel relation between the dynamics associated with the spontaneous perceptual alternations and the speed of traveling waves across observers. In addition, we found evidence for traveling waves even when the events triggering them were initiated within regions of the visual field where binocular vision was stable, in the absence of binocular rivalry, implying that perceptual organization generally depends on spatio-temporal context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271918      PMCID: PMC2674797          DOI: 10.1167/9.2.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors.

Authors:  G C Baylis; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

2.  Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: the effect of visual onsets and offsets.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

3.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Chronometric analysis supports fusion rather than suppression theory of binocular vision.

Authors:  R P O'Shea
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; S Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading.

Authors:  S Grossberg; E Mingolla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The precedence of binocular fusion over binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R Blake; K Boothroyd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-02

9.  Is binocular vision always monocular?

Authors:  R Blake; J Camisa
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Neural field model of binocular rivalry waves.

Authors:  Paul C Bressloff; Matthew A Webber
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Attention model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; James Rankin; John Rinzel; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State.

Authors:  Guillaume Riesen; Anthony M Norcia; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry by collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Sang-Hun Lee; June Kim; David Heeger; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  From invasion to extinction in heterogeneous neural fields.

Authors:  Paul C Bressloff
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 1.300

7.  Why is Binocular Rivalry Uncommon? Discrepant Monocular Images in the Real World.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  An integrated framework of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Callosal connections of primary visual cortex predict the spatial spreading of binocular rivalry across the visual hemifields.

Authors:  Erhan Genç; Johanna Bergmann; Frank Tong; Randolph Blake; Wolf Singer; Axel Kohler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Laminar Neural Field Model of Laterally Propagating Waves of Orientation Selectivity.

Authors:  Paul C Bressloff; Samuel R Carroll
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.