Literature DB >> 8333162

A test of Levelt's second proposition for binocular rivalry.

C J Bossink1, P F Stalmeier, C M De Weert.   

Abstract

Levelt's second proposition (1968) was tested by investigating the effect of increasing the stimulus strength on the ipsilateral mean dominance duration. In three experiments, three stimulus dimensions were investigated: luminance contrast, colour contrast, and motion velocity. We included an experiment similar to Levelt's own equipment, in which a reversed contrast stimulus was used. In all three experiments, including the Levelt disk-ring experiment, the proposition was rejected. We conclude that Levelt's proposition cannot always be generalized to a broad class of stimulus dimensions and therefore cannot be held against reciprocal inhibition models.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8333162     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90047-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  18 in total

Review 1.  A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Carlo R Laing; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models.

Authors:  Asya Shpiro; Rodica Curtu; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The influence of chromatic context on binocular color rivalry: perception and neural representation.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; Asya Shpiro; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Bistable perception modeled as competing stochastic integrations at two levels.

Authors:  Guido Gigante; Maurizio Mattia; Jochen Braun; Paolo Del Giudice
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Why is Binocular Rivalry Uncommon? Discrepant Monocular Images in the Real World.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  An integrated framework of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A model of binocular rivalry and cross-orientation suppression.

Authors:  Christopher P Said; David J Heeger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.