Literature DB >> 21734272

Human stereopsis is not limited by the optics of the well-focused eye.

Björn N S Vlaskamp1, Geunyoung Yoon, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

Human stereopsis, the perception of depth from differences in the two eyes' images, is very precise: image differences smaller than a single photoreceptor can be converted into a perceived difference in depth. To better understand what determines this precision, we examined how the eyes' optics affects stereo resolution. We did this by comparing performance with normal, well-focused optics and with optics improved by eliminating chromatic aberration and correcting higher-order aberrations. We first measured luminance contrast sensitivity in both eyes and showed that we had indeed improved optical quality significantly. We then measured stereo resolution in two ways: by finding the finest corrugation in depth that one can perceive, and by finding the smallest disparity one can perceive as different from zero. Our optical manipulation had no effect on stereo performance. We checked this by redoing the experiments at low contrast and again found no effect of improving optical quality. Thus, the resolution of human stereopsis is not limited by the optics of the well-focused eye. We discuss the implications of this remarkable finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21734272      PMCID: PMC3158004          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0980-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  32 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells.

Authors:  A Anzai; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Blurring by fixational eye movements.

Authors:  O Packer; D R Williams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Phase plates for wave-aberration compensation in the human eye.

Authors:  R Navarro; E Moreno-Barriuso; S Bará; T Mancebo
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 3.776

5.  Miniature eye movements enhance fine spatial detail.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Ramon Iovin; Martina Poletti; Fabrizio Santini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; G C DeAngelis; R D Freeman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

8.  The spatial sense of the eye. Proctor lecture.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Vision improvement by correcting higher-order aberrations with phase plates in normal eyes.

Authors:  Geunyoung Yoon; Tae Moon Jeong; Ian G Cox; David R Williams
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  7 in total

1.  Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Optics and neural adaptation jointly limit human stereovision.

Authors:  Cherlyn J Ng; Randolph Blake; Martin S Banks; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Austin Roorda; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Tiffanie T Yu; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Temporal evolution of pattern disparity processing in humans.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Boris M Sheliga; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Contrast Rivalry Paradigm Reveals Suppression of Monocular Input in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Bhagya Lakshmi Marella; Miriam L Conway; Catherine Suttle; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Binocular visual performance and summation after correcting higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Len Zheleznyak; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Corneal functional optical zone under monocular and binocular assessment.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Diego de Ortueta; Shwetabh Verma
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.