Literature DB >> 24453329

The limits of human stereopsis in space and time.

David Kane1, Phillip Guan, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

To encode binocular disparity, the visual system determines the image patches in one eye that yield the highest correlation with patches in the other eye. The computation of interocular correlation occurs after spatiotemporal filtering of monocular signals, which leads to restrictions on disparity variations that can support depth perception. We quantified those restrictions by measuring humans' ability to see disparity variation at a wide range of spatial and temporal frequencies. Lower-disparity thresholds cut off at very low spatiotemporal frequencies, which is consistent with the behavior of V1 neurons. Those thresholds are space-time separable, suggesting that the underlying neural mechanisms are separable. We also found that upper-disparity limits were characterized by a spatiotemporal, disparity-gradient limit; to be visible, disparity variation cannot exceed a fixed amount for a given interval in space-time. Our results illustrate that the disparity variations that humans can see are very restricted compared with the corresponding luminance variations. The results also provide insight into the neural mechanisms underlying depth from disparity, such as why stimuli with long interocular delays can still yield clear depth percepts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24453329      PMCID: PMC3898296          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1652-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  44 in total

1.  Joint-encoding of motion and depth by visual cortical neurons: neural basis of the Pulfrich effect.

Authors:  A Anzai; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; G C DeAngelis; R D Freeman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing.

Authors:  L K Cormack; S B Stevenson; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Spatio-temporal integration in binocular-kinetic space perception.

Authors:  D N Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface.

Authors:  D H Kelly
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-10

8.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  J A Movshon; I D Thompson; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  How does binocular delay give information about depth?

Authors:  D C Burr; J Ross
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  19 in total

1.  Depth and luminance edges attract.

Authors:  Alan E Robinson; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Stereoscopic 3D display technique using spatiotemporal interlacing has improved spatial and temporal properties.

Authors:  Paul V Johnson; Joohwan Kim; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Mice Discriminate Stereoscopic Surfaces Without Fixating in Depth.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Veronica Choi; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Optics and neural adaptation jointly limit human stereovision.

Authors:  Cherlyn J Ng; Randolph Blake; Martin S Banks; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of temporal frequency on binocular deficits in amblyopia.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Adriana Ferreira; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Depth variation and stereo processing tasks in natural scenes.

Authors:  Arvind V Iyer; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.

Authors:  Sid Henriksen; Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Esther Lin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  ASTEROID: A New Clinical Stereotest on an Autostereo 3D Tablet.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; Craig Sharp; Gareth Slack; Carla Black; Therese Casanova; Jess Hugill; Sheima Rafiq; James Burridge; Vito Puyat; Josee Ewane Enongue; Henry Gale; Hannah Akotei; Zoe Collier; Helen Haggerty; Kathryn Smart; Christine Powell; Kate Taylor; Michael P Clarke; Graham Morgan; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Dynamics of absolute and relative disparity processing in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Milena Kaestner; Marissa L Evans; Yulan D Chen; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.