Literature DB >> 9248059

Fine-scale processing in human binocular stereopsis.

J M Harris1, S P McKee, H S Smallman.   

Abstract

Many studies have demonstrated that the human visual system is sensitive to very small differences in relative binocular disparity. It is not known over what monocular regions information is spatially integrated to mediate performance in such tasks. In this study we present psychophysical observations that define the smallest spatial scale involved in disparity processing, and we indicate the nature of the computations performed by the units mediating that disparity discrimination. We show that human observers can identify the sign of disparity of a single target dot when it is embedded in a row of identical dots, with these noise dots presented either in the fixation plane or with a proportion binocularly uncorrelated. In conjunction with the psychophysical data, we explore how a class of simple correlator models of stereopsis must be constrained in order to account for human performance for the same fine-scale tasks. Such models can perform the task only when the correlation is carried out over a very small region of the image, for a very small range of disparities. Our results demonstrate that there is a fine-scale input to the stereo system, mediated by foveal mechanisms that spatially integrate visual signals over a region as small as 4-6 arcmin in diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9248059     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.14.001673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  11 in total

1.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Key characteristics of specular stereo.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Development of Relative Disparity Sensitivity in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; Holly E Gerhard; Wesley J Meredith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Depth variation and stereo processing tasks in natural scenes.

Authors:  Arvind V Iyer; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The integration of disparity, shading and motion parallax cues for depth perception in humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Peter H Schiller; Warren M Slocum; Brian Jao; Veronica S Weiner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Image-size differences worsen stereopsis independent of eye position.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.

Authors:  Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Spatial stereoresolution for depth corrugations may be set in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.