Literature DB >> 19255134

A combination of hand-held models and computer imaging programs helps students answer oral questions about molecular structure and function: a controlled investigation of student learning.

Michelle A Harris1, Ronald F Peck, Shannon Colton, Jennifer Morris, Elias Chaibub Neto, Julie Kallio.   

Abstract

We conducted a controlled investigation to examine whether a combination of computer imagery and tactile tools helps introductory cell biology laboratory undergraduate students better learn about protein structure/function relationships as compared with computer imagery alone. In all five laboratory sections, students used the molecular imaging program, Protein Explorer (PE). In the three experimental sections, three-dimensional physical models were made available to the students, in addition to PE. Student learning was assessed via oral and written research summaries and videotaped interviews. Differences between the experimental and control group students were not found in our typical course assessments such as research papers, but rather were revealed during one-on-one interviews with students at the end of the semester. A subset of students in the experimental group produced superior answers to some higher-order interview questions as compared with students in the control group. During the interview, students in both groups preferred to use either the hand-held models alone or in combination with the PE imaging program. Students typically did not use any tools when answering knowledge (lower-level thinking) questions, but when challenged with higher-level thinking questions, students in both the control and experimental groups elected to use the models.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255134      PMCID: PMC2649655          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.08-07-0039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  10 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Protein Explorer: easy yet powerful macromolecular visualization.

Authors:  Eric Martz
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Education. Scientific teaching.

Authors:  Jo Handelsman; Diane Ebert-May; Robert Beichner; Peter Bruns; Amy Chang; Robert DeHaan; Jim Gentile; Sarah Lauffer; James Stewart; Shirley M Tilghman; William B Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Approaches to biology teaching and learning: learning styles and the problem of instructional selection--engaging all students in science courses.

Authors:  Kimberly Tanner; Deborah Allen
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2004

5.  Points of view: a survey of survey courses: are they effective?

Authors:  Arri Eisen; Janet M Batzli; David Becker; Douglas M Fambrough; Rebecca Pearlman; Richard Shingles; Rae Brosnan; Mary Lee Ledbetter; A Malcolm Campbell
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

6.  Integrating PCR theory and bioinformatics into a research-oriented primer design exercise.

Authors:  Amber L Robertson; Allison R Phillips
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Aligning goals, assessments, and activities: an approach to teaching PCR and gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Allison R Phillips; Amber L Robertson; Janet Batzli; Michelle Harris; Sarah Miller
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI).

Authors:  Kathy Garvin-Doxas; Michael W Klymkowsky
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Tactile teaching: Exploring protein structure/function using physical models*.

Authors:  Tim Herman; Jennifer Morris; Shannon Colton; Ann Batiza; Michael Patrick; Margaret Franzen; David S Goodsell
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.160

10.  Physical models enhance molecular three-dimensional literacy in an introductory biochemistry course*.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Roberts; Eric Hagedorn; Paul Dillenburg; Michael Patrick; Timothy Herman
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.160

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Analysis of students' aptitude to provide meaning to images that represent cellular components at the molecular level.

Authors:  Hassen-Reda Dahmani; Patricia Schneeberger; Ijsbrand M Kramer
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Protein structure in context: the molecular landscape of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Elise A Span; David S Goodsell; Ramani Ramchandran; Margaret A Franzen; Tim Herman; Daniel S Sem
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.160

3.  Student learning about biomolecular self-assembly using two different external representations.

Authors:  Gunnar E Höst; Caroline Larsson; Arthur Olson; Lena A E Tibell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Using comparative genomics for inquiry-based learning to dissect virulence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia pestis.

Authors:  David J Baumler; Lois M Banta; Kai F Hung; Jodi A Schwarz; Eric L Cabot; Jeremy D Glasner; Nicole T Perna
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Visualizing protein interactions and dynamics: evolving a visual language for molecular animation.

Authors:  Jodie Jenkinson; Gaël McGill
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Physical models have gender-specific effects on student understanding of protein structure-function relationships.

Authors:  Robin M Forbes-Lorman; Michelle A Harris; Wesley S Chang; Erik W Dent; Erik V Nordheim; Margaret A Franzen
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 1.160

7.  STEM BUILD: An Online Community To Decrease Barriers to Implementation of Inclusive Tactile Teaching Tools.

Authors:  Melissa V Ramirez; Claire L Gordy
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2020-04-10

8.  Education catching up with science: preparing students for three-dimensional literacy in cell biology.

Authors:  Ijsbrand M Kramer; Hassen-Reda Dahmani; Pamina Delouche; Marissa Bidabe; Patricia Schneeberger
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Active learning in the lecture theatre using 3D printed objects.

Authors:  David P Smith
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-01-13

10.  Assemble-And-Match: A Novel Hybrid Tool for Enhancing Education and Research in Rational Structure Based Drug Design.

Authors:  Pouya Tavousi; Reza Amin; Sina Shahbazmohamadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.