Literature DB >> 18316813

Aligning goals, assessments, and activities: an approach to teaching PCR and gel electrophoresis.

Allison R Phillips1, Amber L Robertson, Janet Batzli, Michelle Harris, Sarah Miller.   

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and gel electrophoresis have become common techniques used in undergraduate molecular and cell biology labs. Although students enjoy learning these techniques, they often cannot fully comprehend and analyze the outcomes of their experiments because of a disconnect between concepts taught in lecture and experiments done in lab. Here we report the development and implementation of novel exercises that integrate the biological concepts of DNA structure and replication with the techniques of PCR and gel electrophoresis. Learning goals were defined based on concepts taught throughout the cell biology lab course and learning objectives specific to the PCR and gel electrophoresis lab. Exercises developed to promote critical thinking and target the underlying concepts of PCR, primer design, gel analysis, and troubleshooting were incorporated into an existing lab unit based on the detection of genetically modified organisms. Evaluative assessments for each exercise were aligned with the learning goals and used to measure student learning achievements. Our analysis found that the exercises were effective in enhancing student understanding of these concepts as shown by student performance across all learning goals. The new materials were particularly helpful in acquiring relevant knowledge, fostering critical-thinking skills, and uncovering prevalent misconceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316813      PMCID: PMC2262121          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.07-07-0052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  8 in total

1.  Approaches to cell biology teaching: learning content in context--problem-based learning.

Authors:  Deborah Allen; Kimberly Tanner
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2003

2.  Education. Scientific teaching.

Authors:  Jo Handelsman; Diane Ebert-May; Robert Beichner; Peter Bruns; Amy Chang; Robert DeHaan; Jim Gentile; Sarah Lauffer; James Stewart; Shirley M Tilghman; William B Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Approaches to biology teaching and learning: learning styles and the problem of instructional selection--engaging all students in science courses.

Authors:  Kimberly Tanner; Deborah Allen
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2004

4.  Points of view: a survey of survey courses: are they effective?

Authors:  Arri Eisen; Janet M Batzli; David Becker; Douglas M Fambrough; Rebecca Pearlman; Richard Shingles; Rae Brosnan; Mary Lee Ledbetter; A Malcolm Campbell
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

5.  Molecular and cellular biology animations: development and impact on student learning.

Authors:  Phillip McClean; Christina Johnson; Roxanne Rogers; Lisa Daniels; John Reber; Brian M Slator; Jeff Terpstra; Alan White
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

6.  Introductory biology courses: a framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses.

Authors:  Ann C Smith; Richard Stewart; Patricia Shields; Jennifer Hayes-Klosteridis; Paulette Robinson; Robert Yuan
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

7.  A small-scale concept-based laboratory component: the best of both worlds.

Authors:  Dina Gould Halme; Julia Khodor; Rudolph Mitchell; Graham C Walker
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Novel AroA with high tolerance to glyphosate, encoded by a gene of Pseudomonas putida 4G-1 isolated from an extremely polluted environment in China.

Authors:  Yi-Cheng Sun; Yan-Cheng Chen; Zhe-Xian Tian; Feng-Mei Li; Xin-Yue Wang; Jing Zhang; Zhen-Long Xiao; Min Lin; Niamh Gilmartin; David N Dowling; Yi-Ping Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Using online lectures to make time for active learning.

Authors:  Amy J Prunuske; Janet Batzli; Evelyn Howell; Sarah Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A combination of hand-held models and computer imaging programs helps students answer oral questions about molecular structure and function: a controlled investigation of student learning.

Authors:  Michelle A Harris; Ronald F Peck; Shannon Colton; Jennifer Morris; Elias Chaibub Neto; Julie Kallio
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: positive relationships with long-term student achievement.

Authors:  Terry L Derting; Diane Ebert-May
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Studying human disease genes in Caenorhabditis elegans: a molecular genetics laboratory project.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Cox-Paulson; Theresa M Grana; Michelle A Harris; Janet M Batzli
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Scientific teaching: defining a taxonomy of observable practices.

Authors:  Brian A Couch; Tanya L Brown; Tyler J Schelpat; Mark J Graham; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Utilisation of Oxford Nanopore sequencing to generate six complete gastropod mitochondrial genomes as part of a biodiversity curriculum.

Authors:  Mattia De Vivo; Hsin-Han Lee; Yu-Sin Huang; Niklas Dreyer; Chia-Ling Fong; Felipe Monteiro Gomes de Mattos; Dharmesh Jain; Yung-Hui Victoria Wen; John Karichu Mwihaki; Tzi-Yuan Wang; Ryuji J Machida; John Wang; Benny K K Chan; Isheng Jason Tsai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Re: misconceptions are "so yesterday!".

Authors:  Gregory J Crowther; Rebecca M Price
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.