Literature DB >> 8611128

The morbidity of defunctioning stomata.

F Chen1, M Stuart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of a defunctioning stoma in restorative resection of rectal carcinoma is unclear. Traditionally, the loop colostomy has been preferred.
METHODS: All patients with either a defunctioning loop ileostomy or colostomy treated by a single surgeon (MS) were studied. The morbidity of stoma construction and closure, as well as problems experienced in the intervening period, were entered on a database.
RESULTS: No significant difference in the morbidity of closure was noted when loop ileostomy was compared to loop colostomy. Although a trend favouring loop ileostomy was noted when interval morbidity was examined, this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Loop colostomy and ileostomy are both effective in defunctioning the distal colon following a restorative resection for rectal carcinoma. There is some morbidity associated with both but when a stoma is constructed, loop ileostomy is preferable. The loop ileostomy is generally easier to manage and is not associated with a greater rate of complications (in its construction and closure) than the loop colostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8611128     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb01168.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  16 in total

1.  Retreatment of a patient who presented with synchronous multiple primary colorectal carcinoma: report of a case.

Authors:  Zheng Jiang; Shan Muhammad; Xishan Wang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hong Zhi Geng; Dilidan Nasier; Bing Liu; Hua Gao; Yi Ke Xu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Is there an Advantage to a Minimally Invasive Approach?

Authors:  Monica T Young; Grace S Hwang; Gopal Menon; Timothy F Feldmann; Mehraneh D Jafari; Fariba Jafari; Eden Perez; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The cost-effectiveness of colonic stenting as a bridge to curative surgery in patients with acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Steven Latosinsky; Brennan M R Spiegel; Laura E Targownik
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 6.  The incidence of stoma related morbidity - a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Tam Malik; M J Lee; A B Harikrishnan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary?

Authors:  Mark H Hanna; Alessio Vinci; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure.

Authors:  Aneel Bhangu; Dmitri Nepogodiev; Kaori Futaba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

Authors:  Michael Kwiatt; Michitaka Kawata
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

10.  Low or Ultralow Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer Without Diverting Stoma: Experience with 28 Patients.

Authors:  E Soltani; A Jangjoo; E Saremi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.