Literature DB >> 19219432

Pulsed lavage reduces the incidence of radiolucent lines under the tibial tray of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: pulsed lavage versus syringe lavage.

Michael Clarius1, Christian Hauck, Joern B Seeger, Andrew James, David W Murray, Peter R Aldinger.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine whether the incidence of radiolucencies can be reduced using pulsed lavage before cementing the tibia in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). We prospectively studied a consecutive series of 112 cemented Oxford UKA in 100 patients in two centres. In group A (n = 56) pulsed lavage and in group B (n = 56) conventional syringe lavage was used to clean the cancellous bone. The same standardised cementing technique was applied in all cases. At a minimum follow-up of one year patients were evaluated clinically and screened radiographs were obtained. The cement bone interface under the tibial plateau was divided into four zones and evaluated for the presence of radiolucent lines. All radiographs were evaluated (n = 112), and radiolucencies in all four zones were found in two cases in group A (4%) and in 12 cases in group B (22%) (p = 0.0149). Cement penetration showed a median of 2.6 mm (group A) and 1.5 mm (group B) (p < 0.0001). We recommend the routine use of pulsed lavage in Oxford UKA to reduce the incidence of radiolucency and to improve long-term fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19219432      PMCID: PMC2899174          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0736-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  [Significance of jet lavage for in vitro and in vivo cement penetration].

Authors:  S J Breusch; U Schneider; T Reitzel; J Kreutzer; V Ewerbeck; M Lukoschek
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  Radiological factors influencing femoral and acetabular failure in cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  M A Ritter; H Zhou; C M Keating; E M Keating; P M Faris; J B Meding; M E Berend
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-11

3.  Lavage technique in total hip arthroplasty: jet lavage produces better cement penetration than syringe lavage in the proximal femur.

Authors:  S J Breusch; T L Norman; U Schneider; T Reitzel; J D Blaha; M Lukoschek
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  [Effect of femoral intramedullary irrigation on periprosthetic cement distribution: jet lavage versus syringe lavage].

Authors:  D Wirtz; R M Sellei; F Portheine; A Prescher; M Weber
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

5.  Observations on the fixation of implants to the bony skeleton.

Authors:  R S Ling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee.

Authors:  S B Tibrewal; K A Grant; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1984-08

7.  Strength of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  W R Krause; W Krug; J Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  M Halawa; A J Lee; R S Ling; S S Vangala
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1978-08-11

9.  The natural history and significance of radiolucent lines at a cemented femoral interface.

Authors:  H Iwaki; G Scott; M A R Freeman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-05

10.  Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on polymethylmethacrylate fixation.

Authors:  M J Askew; J W Steege; J L Lewis; J R Ranieri; R L Wixson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  26 in total

1.  Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Jan Siewe; Karl S Delank; Peer Eysel; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Anne Gebert de Uhlenbrock
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Augmentation with PMMA cement].

Authors:  K-D Kühn; D Höntzsch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA.

Authors:  Michael Clarius; Christian Hauck; Joern B Seeger; Maria Pritsch; Christian Merle; Peter R Aldinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison of different cement application techniques for tibial component fixation in TKA.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Nicholas E Bishop; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Katrin Nagel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Mohr; J Martin; M Clarius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  A semi-automated measurement technique for the assessment of radiolucency.

Authors:  E C Pegg; B J L Kendrick; H G Pandit; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.

Authors:  B Kerens; M G M Schotanus; B Boonen; P Boog; P J Emans; H Lacroix; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Assessment of radiolucent lines in patients with lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the relationship between these lines and the outcome.

Authors:  Long Xue; Huaming Xue; Tao Wen; Mengying Guan; Tao Yang; Tong Ma; Yihui Tu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  [Modern unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Tips and tricks].

Authors:  F von Knoch; U Munzinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Numa Mercier; Simon Wimsey; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.