Literature DB >> 34173848

Assessment of radiolucent lines in patients with lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the relationship between these lines and the outcome.

Long Xue1, Huaming Xue1, Tao Wen1, Mengying Guan1, Tao Yang1, Tong Ma1, Yihui Tu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the radiolucent lines (RLLs) around both tibial and femoral components in patients following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the records of a consecutive series of patients who had undergone lateral UKA. The RLLs were assessed with standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs post-operatively. The patient-reported outcome measures included the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and Oxford knee score (OKS). The femoral component position (FCP) and femoral-tibial angle (FTA) were also recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 198 UKAs that had appropriate radiographs and outcome scores were reviewed with a median follow-up of 33 (range, 12-71) months. The results suggested that 69 cases (34.8%) had RLLs on the standard radiographs. The incidence rates of femoral and tibial physiological RLLs were 11.6% (23/198) and 26% (52/198), respectively, of which 3% (6/198) concerned both components. All RLLs were considered "physiologic lines" that developed within one year after surgery. There were no significant differences among the types of RLLs in any of the outcome measures. No differences in FCP (P = .359) or FTA (P = .111) at the last follow-up were seen.
CONCLUSIONS: It was found that one-third of UKAs had RLLs on radiographs following lateral UKA. All RLLs developed within one year after surgery. As a clinical consequence, the development of RLLs does not affect the short-term outcomes after lateral UKA.
© 2021. SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome; Component position; Fixed-bearing; Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Limb alignment; Radiolucent lines

Year:  2021        PMID: 34173848     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05115-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year.

Authors:  H Pandit; C Jenkins; D J Beard; J Gallagher; A J Price; C A F Dodd; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

2.  Improved fixation in cementless unicompartmental knee replacement: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H Pandit; A D Liddle; B J L Kendrick; C Jenkins; A J Price; H S Gill; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Mid-term survivorship of minimally invasive unicompartmental arthroplasty with a fixed-bearing implant: revision rate and mechanisms of failure.

Authors:  William G Hamilton; Deborah J Ammeen; Robert H Hopper
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  The incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement and its relationship to outcome.

Authors:  A Gulati; R Chau; H G Pandit; H Gray; A J Price; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-07

Review 5.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiological perspective.

Authors:  K Mukherjee; H Pandit; C A F Dodd; S Ostlere; D W Murray
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B J L Kendrick; B L Kaptein; E R Valstar; H S Gill; W F M Jackson; C A F Dodd; A J Price; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Regional Femoral and Tibial Radiolucency in Cemented Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and the Relationship to Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty modes of failure: wear is not the main reason for failure: a multicentre study of 418 failed knees.

Authors:  J-A Epinette; B Brunschweiler; P Mertl; D Mole; A Cazenave
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 9.  Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Does Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Offer Improved Clinical Advantages Over Total Knee Replacement in the Treatment of Isolated Lateral Osteoarthritis? A Matched Cohort Analysis From an Independent Center.

Authors:  Yihui Tu; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Long Xue; Huaming Xue
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.