Literature DB >> 24759544

A semi-automated measurement technique for the assessment of radiolucency.

E C Pegg1, B J L Kendrick, H G Pandit, H S Gill, D W Murray.   

Abstract

The assessment of radiolucency around an implant is qualitative, poorly defined and has low agreement between clinicians. Accurate and repeatable assessment of radiolucency is essential to prevent misdiagnosis, minimize cases of unnecessary revision, and to correctly monitor and treat patients at risk of loosening and implant failure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether a semi-automated imaging algorithm could improve repeatability and enable quantitative assessment of radiolucency. Six surgeons assessed 38 radiographs of knees after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for radiolucency, and results were compared with assessments made by the semi-automated program. Large variation was found between the surgeon results, with total agreement in only 9.4% of zones and a kappa value of 0.602; whereas the automated program had total agreement in 81.6% of zones and a kappa value of 0.802. The software had a 'fair to excellent' prediction of the presence or the absence of radiolucency, where the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.82 on average. The software predicted radiolucency equally well for cemented and cementless implants (p = 0.996). The identification of radiolucency using an automated method is feasible and these results indicate that it could aid the definition and quantification of radiolucency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knee; measurement; radiolucency; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24759544      PMCID: PMC4032544          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  20 in total

1.  Reliability of detecting prosthesis/cement interface radiolucencies in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yongde Zhang; Aaron W Putnam; Anneliese D Heiner; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiological perspective.

Authors:  K Mukherjee; H Pandit; C A F Dodd; S Ostlere; D W Murray
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Radiological evaluation of the interfaces after cemented total hip replacement. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

Authors:  A W McCaskie; A R Brown; J R Thompson; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-03

5.  A comparison of plain and fluoroscopically guided radiographs in the assessment of arthroplasty of the knee.

Authors:  A D Mintz; C A Pilkington; D W Howie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee.

Authors:  S B Tibrewal; K A Grant; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1984-08

8.  Factors affecting aseptic failure of fixation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Multivariate survival analysis.

Authors:  S Kobayashi; K Takaoka; N Saito; K Hisa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Novel and conventional serum biomarkers predicting acute kidney injury in adult cardiac surgery--a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anja Haase-Fielitz; Rinaldo Bellomo; Prasad Devarajan; David Story; George Matalanis; Duska Dragun; Michael Haase
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Evaluation of factors affecting tibial bone strain after unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Elise C Pegg; Jonathan Walter; Stephen J Mellon; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Darryl D D'Lima; Benjamin J Fregly; Harinderjit S Gill
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  1 in total

1.  Total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture: a clinical and radiographic outcome analysis of 67 patients.

Authors:  André Busch; Ulrich Stöckle; Anna Schreiner; Peter de Zwaart; Aljoscha Schäffler; Björn Gunnar Ochs
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.