Literature DB >> 25209015

[Revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

G Mohr1, J Martin, M Clarius.   

Abstract

Unicompartmental arthroplasty is an efficient and approved treatment option of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee, being performed with increasing frequency worldwide. Compared to total knee replacement, there are several advantages such as faster recovery, lower blood loss, better functional outcome and lower infection rates. However, higher revision rates are a frequent argument against the use of unicompartmental arthroplasty. The following article gives an overview of failure mechanisms and strategies for revision arthroplasty. This article is based on a selective literature review including PubMed and relevant print media. Our own clinical experience is considered as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25209015     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-3013-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  45 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study.

Authors:  J B Seeger; D Haas; S Jäger; E Röhner; S Tohtz; M Clarius
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement.

Authors:  O Furnes; B Espehaug; S A Lie; S E Vollset; L B Engesaeter; L I Havelin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Radiolucency and migration after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul Rea; Andrew Short; Hemant Pandit; Andrew J Price; Peter Kyberd; David J Beard; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; William A Jiranek; Fred J McGlynn
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem.

Authors:  S M Hauptmann; P Weber; C Glaser; C Birkenmaier; V Jansson; P E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early survivorship and analysis of failures in 1000 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Adam G Bergeson; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Jason M Hurst; Michael J Morris; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten- to 13-year follow-up study.

Authors:  L Marmor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Gilles Estour; Charbel Nemer; Pierre-Emmanuel Colle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Hernigou; G Deschamps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory].

Authors:  J Beckmann; M T Hirschmann; G Matziolis; J Holz; R V Eisenhart-Rothe; C Becher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Concentration-Dependent Effects of Cobalt and Chromium Ions on Osteoarthritic Chondrocytes.

Authors:  Christoph Bauer; Christoph Stotter; Vivek Jeyakumar; Eugenia Niculescu-Morzsa; Bojana Simlinger; Manel Rodríguez Ripoll; Thomas Klestil; Friedrich Franek; Stefan Nehrer
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.634

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.