Literature DB >> 11593048

Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location.

B A Wright1, M B Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

Two of the primary cues used to localize the sources of sounds are interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time differences (ITDs). We conducted two experiments to explore how practice affects the human discrimination of values of ILDs and ongoing ITDs presented over headphones. We measured discrimination thresholds of 13 to 32 naive listeners in a variety of conditions during a pretest and again, 2 weeks later, during a posttest. Between those two tests, we trained a subset of listeners 1 h per day for 9 days on a single ILD or ITD condition. Listeners improved on both ILD and ITD discrimination. Improvement was initially rapid for both cue types and appeared to generalize broadly across conditions, indicating conceptual or procedural learning. A subsequent slower-improvement stage, which occurred solely for the ILD cue, only affected conditions with the trained stimulus frequency, suggesting that stimulus processing had fundamentally changed. These different learning patterns indicate that practice affects the attention to, or low-level encoding of, ILDs and ITDs at sites at which the two cue types are processed separately. Thus, these data reveal differences in the effect of practice on ILD and ITD discrimination, and provide insight into the encoding of these two cues to sound-source location in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11593048      PMCID: PMC59810          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.211220498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization.

Authors:  F L Wightman; D J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Practice effects for auditory localization: a test of a differentiation theory of perceptual learning and development.

Authors:  G Russell
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1976-10

3.  On the use of adaptive procedures in binaural experiments.

Authors:  C Trahiotis; L R Bernstein; T N Buell; Z Spektor
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lateralization thresholds obtained under conditions in which the precedence effect is assumed to operate.

Authors:  K Saberi; D R Perrott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interhemispheric transfer of visual information in humans: spatial characteristics.

Authors:  N Berardi; A Fiorentini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Lateralization of bands of noise and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones: effects of spectral locus and bandwidth.

Authors:  C Trahiotis; L R Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  An analysis of the monaural displacement of sound in space.

Authors:  R A Butler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-01

8.  Interaural intensity discrimination: insensitivity at 1000 Hz.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Localization of pure tones and click trains by untrained humans.

Authors:  J M Terhune
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1985

10.  Lateralization of tonal signals which have neither onsets nor offsets.

Authors:  E R Hafter; R H Dye; R H Gilkey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual training: a tool for both modifying the brain and exploring it.

Authors:  M Ahissar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural correlates of olfactory learning: Critical role of centrifugal neuromodulation.

Authors:  Max L Fletcher; Wei R Chen
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Prolonged maturation of auditory perception and learning in gerbils.

Authors:  Emma C Sarro; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.964

7.  Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mary E Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Contributions of procedure and stimulus learning to early, rapid perceptual improvements.

Authors:  Jeanette A Ortiz; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Differential rates of consolidation of conceptual and stimulus learning following training on an auditory skill.

Authors:  Jeanette A Ortiz; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.