Literature DB >> 26428784

Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Frédéric Apoux1, Carla L Youngdahl1, Sarah E Yoho1, Eric W Healy1.   

Abstract

Speech intelligibility in noise can be degraded by using vocoder processing to alter the temporal fine structure (TFS). Here it is argued that this degradation is not attributable to the loss of speech information potentially present in the TFS. Instead it is proposed that the degradation results from the loss of sound-source segregation information when two or more carriers (i.e., TFS) are substituted with only one as a consequence of vocoder processing. To demonstrate this segregation role, vocoder processing involving two carriers, one for the target and one for the background, was implemented. Because this approach does not preserve the speech TFS, it may be assumed that any improvement in intelligibility can only be a consequence of the preserved carrier duality and associated segregation cues. Three experiments were conducted using this "dual-carrier" approach. All experiments showed substantial sentence intelligibility in noise improvements compared to traditional single-carrier conditions. In several conditions, the improvement was so substantial that intelligibility approximated that for unprocessed speech in noise. A foreseeable and potentially promising implication for the dual-carrier approach involves implementation into cochlear implant speech processors, where it may provide the TFS cues necessary to segregate speech from noise.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26428784      PMCID: PMC4575322          DOI: 10.1121/1.4928136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  46 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception.

Authors:  O Ghitza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Bomjun J Kwon; Trevor T Perry; Cassie L Wilhelm; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sarah E Yoho; Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Use of a compound approach to derive auditory-filter-wide frequency-importance functions for vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study.

Authors:  Dominik Riss; Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi; Andreas Selberherr; Alexandra Kaider; Michaela Blineder; Veronika Starlinger; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Christoph Arnoldner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xing Li; Kaibao Nie; Nikita S Imennov; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein; Les E Atlas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Consonant identification using temporal fine structure and recovered envelope cues.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Charlotte M Reed; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Susan Van Wie; Rene H Gifford; Philipos C Loizou; Louise M Loiselle; Tyler Oakes; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Dual-Carrier Processing on the Intelligibility of Concurrent Vocoded Sentences.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.