Literature DB >> 19141879

Monte Carlo modeling of a 6 and 18 MV Varian Clinac medical accelerator for in-field and out-of-field dose calculations: development and validation.

Bryan Bednarz1, X George Xu.   

Abstract

There is a serious and growing concern about the increased risk of radiation-induced second cancers and late tissue injuries associated with radiation treatment. To better understand and to more accurately quantify non-target organ doses due to scatter and leakage radiation from medical accelerators, a detailed Monte Carlo model of the medical linear accelerator is needed. This paper describes the development and validation of a detailed accelerator model of the Varian Clinac operating at 6 and 18 MV beam energies. Over 100 accelerator components have been defined and integrated using the Monte Carlo code MCNPX. A series of in-field and out-of-field dose validation studies were performed. In-field dose distributions calculated using the accelerator models were tuned to match measurement data that are considered the de facto 'gold standard' for the Varian Clinac accelerator provided by the manufacturer. Field sizes of 4 cm x 4 cm, 10 cm x 10 cm, 20 cm x 20 cm and 40 cm x 40 cm were considered. The local difference between calculated and measured dose on the percent depth dose curve was less than 2% for all locations. The local difference between calculated and measured dose on the dose profile curve was less than 2% in the plateau region and less than 2 mm in the penumbra region for all locations. Out-of-field dose profiles were calculated and compared to measurement data for both beam energies for field sizes of 4 cm x 4 cm, 10 cm x 10 cm and 20 cm x 20 cm. For all field sizes considered in this study, the average local difference between calculated and measured dose for the 6 and 18 MV beams was 14 and 16%, respectively. In addition, a method for determining neutron contamination in the 18 MV operating model was validated by comparing calculated in-air neutron fluence with reported calculations and measurements. The average difference between calculated and measured neutron fluence was 20%. As one of the most detailed accelerator models for both in-field and out-of-field dose calculations, the model will be combined with anatomically realistic computational patient phantoms into a computational framework to calculate non-target organ doses to patients from various radiation treatment plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19141879      PMCID: PMC3376900          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/4/N01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  27 in total

1.  Monte Carlo calculation of nine megavoltage photon beam spectra using the BEAM code.

Authors:  Daryoush Sheikh-Bagheri; D W O Rogers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Description and dosimetric verification of the PEREGRINE Monte Carlo dose calculation system for photon beams incident on a water phantom.

Authors:  C L Hartmann Siantar; R S Walling; T P Daly; B Faddegon; N Albright; P Bergstrom; A F Bielajew; C Chuang; D Garrett; R K House; D Knapp; D J Wieczorek; L J Verhey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Monte Carlo study of Siemens PRIMUS photoneutron production.

Authors:  J Pena; L Franco; F Gómez; A Iglesias; J Pardo; M Pombar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Mohammad Salehpour; David S Followill; Marilyn Stovall; Deborah A Kuban; R Allen White; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A flattening filter free photon treatment concept evaluation with Monte Carlo.

Authors:  U Titt; O N Vassiliev; F Pönisch; L Dong; H Liu; R Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dosimetry for quantitative analysis of the effects of low-dose ionizing radiation in radiation therapy patients.

Authors:  Joerg Lehmann; Robin L Stern; Thomas P Daly; David M Rocke; Chad W Schwietert; Gregory E Jones; Michelle L Arnold; Christine L Hartmann Siantar; Zelanna Goldberg
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning.

Authors:  Indrin J Chetty; Bruce Curran; Joanna E Cygler; John J DeMarco; Gary Ezzell; Bruce A Faddegon; Iwan Kawrakow; Paul J Keall; Helen Liu; C M Charlie Ma; D W O Rogers; Jan Seuntjens; Daryoush Sheikh-Bagheri; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A Monte Carlo model for out-of-field dose calculation from high-energy photon therapy.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Uwe Titt; David Followill; Falk Pönisch; Oleg N Vassiliev; R Allen White; Marilyn Stovall; Mohammad Salehpour
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  3D electron dose calculation using a Voxel based Monte Carlo algorithm (VMC).

Authors:  I Kawrakow; M Fippel; K Friedrich
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT.

Authors:  Eric J Hall; Cheng-Shie Wuu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  22 in total

1.  Methodology for determining doses to in-field, out-of-field and partially in-field organs for late effects studies in photon radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Sarah B Scarboro; Phillip J Taddei; Sunil Krishnan; Stephen F Kry; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers.

Authors:  Song Wang; Joseph K Gardner; John J Gordon; Weidong Li; Luke Clews; Peter B Greer; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Simple proposal for dosimetry with an Elekta iViewGT™ electronic portal imaging device (EPID) using commercial software modules.

Authors:  Janett Liebich; Jörg Licher; Christian Scherf; Eugen Kara; Nadine Koch; Claus Rödel; Ulla Ramm
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  A comparative study on the risk of second primary cancers in out-of-field organs associated with radiotherapy of localized prostate carcinoma using Monte Carlo-based accelerator and patient models.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; Basit Athar; X George Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Monte Carlo Simulation of Siemens ONCOR Linear Accelerator with BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc Code.

Authors:  Keyvan Jabbari; Hossein Saberi Anvar; Mohammad Bagher Tavakoli; Alireza Amouheidari
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2013-07

6.  Comparison of out-of-field photon doses in 6 MV IMRT and neutron doses in proton therapy for adult and pediatric patients.

Authors:  Basit S Athar; Bryan Bednarz; Joao Seco; Cindy Hancox; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Measurement and modeling of out-of-field doses from various advanced post-mastectomy radiotherapy techniques.

Authors:  Jihyung Yoon; David Heins; Xiaodong Zhao; Mary Sanders; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Toward real-time Monte Carlo simulation using a commercial cloud computing infrastructure.

Authors:  Henry Wang; Yunzhi Ma; Guillem Pratx; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Wassim Jalbout; Rebecca M Howell; Nabil Khater; Fady Geara; Kenneth Homann; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Calculated organ doses from selected prostate treatment plans using Monte Carlo simulations and an anatomically realistic computational phantom.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; Cindy Hancox; X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.