Literature DB >> 19746793

Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers.

Song Wang1, Joseph K Gardner, John J Gordon, Weidong Li, Luke Clews, Peter B Greer, Jeffrey V Siebers.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present an efficient method to generate imager-specific Monte Carlo (MC)-based dose kernels for amorphous silicon-based electronic portal image device dose prediction and determine the effective backscattering thicknesses for such imagers. EPID field size-dependent responses were measured for five matched Varian accelerators from three institutions with 6 MV beams at the source to detector distance (SDD) of 105 cm. For two imagers, measurements were made with and without the imager mounted on the robotic supporting arm. Monoenergetic energy deposition kernels with 0-2.5 cm of water backscattering thicknesses were simultaneously computed by MC to a high precision. For each imager, the backscattering thickness required to match measured field size responses was determined. The monoenergetic kernel method was validated by comparing measured and predicted field size responses at 150 cm SDD, 10 x 10 cm2 multileaf collimator (MLC) sliding window fields created with 5, 10, 20, and 50 mm gaps, and a head-and-neck (H&N) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) patient field. Field size responses for the five different imagers deviated by up to 1.3%. When imagers were removed from the robotic arms, response deviations were reduced to 0.2%. All imager field size responses were captured by using between 1.0 and 1.6 cm backscatter. The predicted field size responses by the imager-specific kernels matched measurements for all involved imagers with the maximal deviation of 0.34%. The maximal deviation between the predicted and measured field size responses at 150 cm SDD is 0.39%. The maximal deviation between the predicted and measured MLC sliding window fields is 0.39%. For the patient field, gamma analysis yielded that 99.0% of the pixels have gamma < 1 by the 2%, 2 mm criteria with a 3% dose threshold. Tunable imager-specific kernels can be generated rapidly and accurately in a single MC simulation. The resultant kernels are imager position independent and are able to predict fields with varied incident energy spectra and a H&N IMRT patient field. The proposed adaptive EPID dose kernel method provides the necessary infrastructure to build reliable and accurate portal dosimetry systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19746793      PMCID: PMC2724176          DOI: 10.1118/1.3158732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  48 in total

1.  A Monte Carlo study of radiation transport through multileaf collimators.

Authors:  J O Kim; J V Siebers; P J Keall; M R Arnfield; R Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Monte Carlo calculation of nine megavoltage photon beam spectra using the BEAM code.

Authors:  Daryoush Sheikh-Bagheri; D W O Rogers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  An investigation of a new amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for transit dosimetry.

Authors:  Ellen E Grein; Richard Lee; Kurt Luchka
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dosimetric IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID.

Authors:  B Warkentin; S Steciw; S Rathee; B G Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Experimental verification of a portal dose prediction model.

Authors:  W J C van Elmpt; S M J J G Nijsten; B J Mijnheer; A W H Minken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A Monte Carlo based three-dimensional dose reconstruction method derived from portal dose images.

Authors:  Wouter J C van Elmpt; Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten; Robert F H Schiffeleers; André L A J Dekker; Ben J Mijnheer; Philippe Lambin; André W H Minken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Investigation of tilted dose kernels for portal dose prediction in a-Si electronic portal imagers.

Authors:  K Chytyk; B M C McCurdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Correction of pixel sensitivity variation and off-axis response for amorphous silicon EPID dosimetry.

Authors:  Peter B Greer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Using fluence separation to account for energy spectra dependence in computing dosimetric a-Si EPID images for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Weidong Li; Jeffrey V Siebers; Joseph A Moore
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Comparison of measured and computed portal dose for IMRT treatment.

Authors:  Savino Cilla; Pietro Viola; Luigi Azario; Luca Grimaldi; Maurizio Craus; Guido D'Onofrio; Andrea Fidanzio; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Angelo Piermattei
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  4 in total

1.  Simple proposal for dosimetry with an Elekta iViewGT™ electronic portal imaging device (EPID) using commercial software modules.

Authors:  Janett Liebich; Jörg Licher; Christian Scherf; Eugen Kara; Nadine Koch; Claus Rödel; Ulla Ramm
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  A quality assurance phantom for electronic portal imaging devices.

Authors:  Indra J Das; Minsong Cao; Chee-Wai Cheng; Vladimir Misic; Klaus Scheuring; Edmund Schüle; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  A method for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT and VMAT based on electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Xiuqing Li; Miaomiao Lu; Qilin Zhang; Xile Zhang; Ruijie Yang; Maria F Chan; Junhai Wen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Calibration of a detector array through beam profile reconstruction with error-locking.

Authors:  Song Wang; Zhiqiu Li; K S Clifford Chao; Jenghwa Chang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.