Literature DB >> 12694826

Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT.

Eric J Hall1, Cheng-Shie Wuu.   

Abstract

Information concerning radiation-induced malignancies comes from the A-bomb survivors and from medically exposed individuals, including second cancers in radiation therapy patients. The A-bomb survivors show an excess incidence of carcinomas in tissues such as the gastrointestinal tract, breast, thyroid, and bladder, which is linear with dose up to about 2.5 Sv. There is great uncertainty concerning the dose-response relationship for radiation-induced carcinogenesis at higher doses. Some animal and human data suggest a decrease at higher doses, usually attributed to cell killing; other data suggest a plateau in dose. Radiotherapy patients also show an excess incidence of carcinomas, often in sites remote from the treatment fields; in addition there is an excess incidence of sarcomas in the heavily irradiated in-field tissues. The transition from conventional radiotherapy to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) involves a reduction in the volume of normal tissues receiving a high dose, with an increase in dose to the target volume that includes the tumor and a limited amount of normal tissue. One might expect a decrease in the number of sarcomas induced and also (less certain) a small decrease in the number of carcinomas. All around, a good thing. By contrast, the move from 3D-CRT to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) involves more fields, and the dose-volume histograms show that, as a consequence, a larger volume of normal tissue is exposed to lower doses. In addition, the number of monitor units is increased by a factor of 2 to 3, increasing the total body exposure, due to leakage radiation. Both factors will tend to increase the risk of second cancers. Altogether, IMRT is likely to almost double the incidence of second malignancies compared with conventional radiotherapy from about 1% to 1.75% for patients surviving 10 years. The numbers may be larger for longer survival (or for younger patients), but the ratio should remain the same.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Radiation Health; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12694826     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00073-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  313 in total

1.  [Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of head and neck tumors. Increased biological effectiveness in high-risk situations by "integrated boost" therapy].

Authors:  D Milanovic; F Lohr; K Götte; B Dobler; B Hermann; K Hörmann; F Wenz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Dosimetric integration of daily mega-voltage cone-beam CT for image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  A Zabel-du Bois; S Nill; S Ulrich; U Oelfke; B Rhein; P Haering; S Milker-Zabel; A Schwahofer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice.

Authors:  M Teoh; C H Clark; K Wood; S Whitaker; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Effect of photon-beam energy on VMAT and IMRT treatment plan quality and dosimetric accuracy for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marlies Pasler; Dietmar Georg; Holger Wirtz; Johannes Lutterbach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of helical tomotherapy, forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-phase conformal plans for radical radiotherapy treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  S Chatterjee; N Willis; S M Locks; J H Mott; C G Kelly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Exploring two two-edged swords.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Comparison of total MU and segment areas in VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT plans.

Authors:  Motohiro Kawashima; Shuichi Ozawa; Akihiro Haga; Akira Sakumi; Chie Kurokawa; Satoru Sugimoto; Kumiko Karasawa; Keiichi Nakagawa; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-07-01

8.  Microdosimetric measurements in the secondary radiation field produced in (12)C-therapy irradiations.

Authors:  F Wissmann; U Giesen; T Klages; D Schardt; G Martino; C Sunil
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Comparison of risk of radiogenic second cancer following photon and proton craniospinal irradiation for a pediatric medulloblastoma patient.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Rebecca M Howell; Annelise Giebeler; Phillip J Taddei; Anita Mahajan; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Radiation-induced sarcomas of the head and neck.

Authors:  Anuradha Thiagarajan; N Gopalakrishna Iyer
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.