Literature DB >> 29048329

Measurement and modeling of out-of-field doses from various advanced post-mastectomy radiotherapy techniques.

Jihyung Yoon1, David Heins, Xiaodong Zhao, Mary Sanders, Rui Zhang.   

Abstract

More and more advanced radiotherapy techniques have been adopted for post-mastectomy radiotherapies (PMRT). Patient dose reconstruction is challenging for these advanced techniques because they increase the low out-of-field dose area while the accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by current commercial treatment planning systems (TPSs) is poor. We aim to measure and model the out-of-field radiation doses from various advanced PMRT techniques. PMRT treatment plans for an anthropomorphic phantom were generated, including volumetric modulated arc therapy with standard and flattening-filter-free photon beams, mixed beam therapy, 4-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and tomotherapy. We measured doses in the phantom where the TPS calculated doses were lower than 5% of the prescription dose using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The TLD measurements were corrected by two additional energy correction factors, namely out-of-beam out-of-field (OBOF) correction factor K OBOF and in-beam out-of-field (IBOF) correction factor K IBOF, which were determined by separate measurements using an ion chamber and TLD. A simple analytical model was developed to predict out-of-field dose as a function of distance from the field edge for each PMRT technique. The root mean square discrepancies between measured and calculated out-of-field doses were within 0.66 cGy Gy-1 for all techniques. The IBOF doses were highly scattered and should be evaluated case by case. One can easily combine the measured out-of-field dose here with the in-field dose calculated by the local TPS to reconstruct organ doses for a specific PMRT patient if the same treatment apparatus and technique were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29048329      PMCID: PMC5724526          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa94b5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  55 in total

1.  Peripheral dose from a linear accelerator equipped with multileaf collimation.

Authors:  R L Stern
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Electron conformal radiotherapy using bolus and intensity modulation.

Authors:  Rajat J Kudchadker; Kenneth R Hogstrom; Adam S Garden; Marsha D McNeese; Robert A Boyd; John A Antolak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters.

Authors:  T H Kirby; W F Hanson; D A Johnston
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Flattening filter free vs flattened beams for breast irradiation.

Authors:  Kees H Spruijt; Max Dahele; Johan P Cuijpers; Marloes Jeulink; Derek Rietveld; Ben J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Cancer induction by radiotherapy: dose dependence and spatial relationship to irradiated volume.

Authors:  Wolfgang Dörr; Thomas Herrmann
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.394

6.  Systematic measurements of whole-body dose distributions for various treatment machines and delivery techniques in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Roger A Halg; Jurgen Besserer; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Out-of-field dose measurements in a water phantom using different radiotherapy modalities.

Authors:  R Kaderka; D Schardt; M Durante; T Berger; U Ramm; J Licher; C La Tessa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Technical Report: Evaluation of peripheral dose for flattening filter free photon beams.

Authors:  E L Covington; T A Ritter; J M Moran; A M Owrangi; J I Prisciandaro
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  In vivo dosimetry in external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ben Mijnheer; Sam Beddar; Joanna Izewska; Chester Reft
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Lung cancer after radiation therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A I Neugut; E Robinson; W C Lee; T Murray; K Karwoski; G J Kutcher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  5 in total

1.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: Comparison of advanced techniques.

Authors:  Yibo Xie; Daniel Bourgeois; Beibei Guo; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.482

2.  Evaluation of Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Techniques in Outfield Organs of Rando Phantom with Thermoluminescence Dosimeter.

Authors:  M Behmadi; H Gholamhosseinian; M Mohammadi; Sh Naseri; M Momennezhad; Sh Bayani; M T Bahreyni Toossi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2019-04-01

3.  Variation of 4 MV X-ray dose rate strongly impacts biological response both in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  M Ben Kacem; M A Benadjaoud; M Dos Santos; F Soysouvanh; V Buard; G Tarlet; B Le Guen; A François; O Guipaud; F Milliat; V Paget
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Nontarget and Out-of-Field Doses from Electron Beam Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Natalia Matuszak; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Agnieszka Skrobala; Adam Ryczkowski; Piotr Romanski; Igor Piotrowski; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Wiktoria Maria Suchorska; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

5.  Comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT out-of-field doses in pediatric patients using Monte Carlo simulations with treatment planning system calculations and measurements.

Authors:  Ana Cravo Sá; Andreia Barateiro; Bryan P Bednarz; Pedro Almeida; Pedro Vaz; Tiago Madaleno
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.