Literature DB >> 19139339

Interobserver reliability of the prism and alternate cover test in children with esotropia.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine 95% limits of agreement on a measurement and on a difference between 2 measurements for the prism and alternate cover test (PACT) at distance and at near fixation.
METHODS: In a test-retest reliability study, 143 children aged 60 months or younger with esotropia were examined by 2 masked examiners on 1 or 2 occasions yielding 199 test-retest pairs for PACT at distance fixation and 239 test-retest pairs for PACT at near fixation.
RESULTS: For angles greater than 20 prism diopters (PD), the 95% limits of agreement on a measurement and on a difference between 2 measurements were +/-7.3 PD and +/-10.4 PD, respectively, for PACT at distance and +/-8.3 PD and +/-11.7 PD, respectively, for PACT at near. For angles of 10 to 20 PD, the 95% limits of agreement on a measurement and on a difference between 2 measurements were +/-4.1 PD and +/-5.8 PD, respectively, for PACT at distance and +/-3.3 PD and +/-4.7 PD, respectively, for PACT at near.
CONCLUSION: In childhood esotropia, differences of 12 PD or more for angles greater than 20 PD and differences of 6 PD or more for angles between 10 PD and 20 PD are likely to indicate real change. Smaller differences could be real change but could also be due to measurement error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19139339      PMCID: PMC2629143          DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  8 in total

1.  The intraexaminer and interexaminer repeatability of the alternate cover test using different prism neutralization endpoints.

Authors:  Heather A Johns; Ruth E Manny; Karen Fern; Ying-Sheng Hu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Defining real change in prism-cover test measurements.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; David A Leske; George G Hohberger
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests.

Authors:  B B Rainey; T L Schroeder; D A Goss; T P Grosvenor
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements.

Authors:  A Arditi; R Cagenello
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Ophthalmic prisms. Measurement errors and how to minimize them.

Authors:  J T Thompson; D L Guyton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  The reliability of grading the fixation preference test for the assessment of interocular visual acuity differences in patients with strabismus.

Authors:  Emin Cumhur Sener; Mehmet Cem Mocan; Sansal Gedik; Ahmet Ergin; Ali Sefik Sanaç
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.220

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Test-retest variability of cyclodeviations measured using the double Maddox rod test.

Authors:  Laura Liebermann; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke.

Authors:  Alex Pollock; Christine Hazelton; Fiona J Rowe; Sven Jonuscheit; Ashleigh Kernohan; Jayne Angilley; Clair A Henderson; Peter Langhorne; Pauline Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-23

3.  Stability of near stereoacuity in childhood intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Michael C Brodsky; Brian G Mohney
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Classifying stability of misalignment in children with esotropia using simulations.

Authors:  B Michele Melia; Jonathan M Holmes; Danielle L Chandler; Stephen P Christiansen
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-12

5.  Variability of angle of deviation measurements in children with intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Laura Liebermann; Brian G Mohney; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Test-retest reliability of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in adults with strabismus.

Authors:  David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Effect of examiner experience and technique on the alternate cover test.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Ruth E Manny; Susan A Cotter; G Lynn Mitchell; Jasmine A Irani
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Change in ocular alignment after topical anesthetic cataract surgery.

Authors:  Seung Ah Chung; Chan Yoon Kim; Jee Ho Chang; Samin Hong; Sung Yong Kang; Gong Je Seong; Jong Bok Lee
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Variability of Ocular Deviation in Strabismus.

Authors:  John R Economides; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.389

10.  Use of a Binocular Optical Coherence Tomography System to Evaluate Strabismus in Primary Position.

Authors:  Reena Chopra; Pádraig J Mulholland; Vijay K Tailor; Roger S Anderson; Pearse A Keane
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.