Literature DB >> 18045567

Defining real change in prism-cover test measurements.

Jonathan M Holmes1, David A Leske, George G Hohberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the interobserver test-retest variability of both simultaneous prism and cover testing (SPCT) and alternate prism and cover testing (APCT) in horizontal deviations, and to calculate 95% limits of agreement that might be used to define real change.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients with sixth nerve palsy and three controls were independently examined by two experienced strabismus surgeons. SPCT and APCT were performed at distance and near fixation. Test-retest variability and agreement between tests were evaluated using Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement were calculated.
RESULTS: For SPCT, the 95% limits of agreement half-widths were 6.3 prism diopters (pd) at distance fixation and 6.9 pd at near. For APCT, the 95% limits of agreement half-widths were 10.2 pd at distance and 9.2 pd at near.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on 95% limits of agreement half-widths between two examiners, a change in strabismus measurements of less than 10 pd may be attributable to test-retest variability. Changes of 10 pd or more are likely to represent real change and might be used as the threshold for management decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18045567      PMCID: PMC2386860          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  8 in total

1.  The intraexaminer and interexaminer repeatability of the alternate cover test using different prism neutralization endpoints.

Authors:  Heather A Johns; Ruth E Manny; Karen Fern; Ying-Sheng Hu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Initial treatment outcomes in chronic sixth nerve palsy.

Authors:  J M Holmes; D A Leske; S P Christiansen
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests.

Authors:  B B Rainey; T L Schroeder; D A Goss; T P Grosvenor
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  The natural history of acute traumatic sixth nerve palsy or paresis.

Authors:  J M Holmes; P J Droste; R W Beck
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements.

Authors:  A Arditi; R Cagenello
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Photographic and clinical techniques for outcome assessment in sixth nerve palsy.

Authors:  J M Holmes; G G Hohberger; D A Leske
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test.

Authors:  S L Fawcett; E E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.220

  8 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Variability of angle of deviation measurements in children with intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Laura Liebermann; Brian G Mohney; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Test-retest reliability of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in adults with strabismus.

Authors:  David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Effect of examiner experience and technique on the alternate cover test.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Ruth E Manny; Susan A Cotter; G Lynn Mitchell; Jasmine A Irani
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Wendy E Adams; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Change in ocular alignment after topical anesthetic cataract surgery.

Authors:  Seung Ah Chung; Chan Yoon Kim; Jee Ho Chang; Samin Hong; Sung Yong Kang; Gong Je Seong; Jong Bok Lee
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Interobserver reliability of the prism and alternate cover test in children with esotropia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01

8.  Variability of Ocular Deviation in Strabismus.

Authors:  John R Economides; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  Impact of laser refractive surgery on ocular alignment in myopic patients.

Authors:  S A Chung; W K Kim; J W Moon; H Yang; J K Kim; S B Lee; J B Lee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  An Evaluation of the Agreement Between a Computerized Stereoscopic Game Test and the TNO Stereoacuity Test.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Portela-Camino; Santiago Martín-González; Javier Ruiz-Alcocer; Igor Illarramendi-Mendicute; Rafaela Garrido-Mercado
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.