Literature DB >> 29317291

Test-retest variability of cyclodeviations measured using the double Maddox rod test.

Laura Liebermann1, David A Leske1, Sarah R Hatt1, Jonathan M Holmes2.   

Abstract

The double Maddox rod test is often used to measure cyclodeviations and to monitor change over time. The purpose of this study was to estimate test-retest reliability and the amount of cyclodeviation that would be considered real change using 95% limits of agreement. We retrospectively studied 86 clinically stable patients with double Maddox rod measurements 5-175 days apart (median, 69 days). The range of cyclodeviation at the first measurement was 6° incyclodeviation to 15° excyclodeviation. We calculated the half width of the 95% limits of agreement to be 4.7°, which means that a change of ≥5° in cyclodeviation would be considered a real change. The threshold of 5° should be used when assessing change between two measurements made with double Maddox rods.
Copyright © 2018 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29317291      PMCID: PMC5916581          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  7 in total

1.  Changes in cyclotorsion and vertical eye alignment during prolonged monocular occlusion.

Authors:  Erich W Graf; James S Maxwell; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effect of surgical treatment of superior oblique muscle palsy on ocular torsion.

Authors:  Ceyhun Arici; Velittin Oguz
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Accuracy of double Maddox rod with induced hypertropia in normal subjects.

Authors:  Justin D Marsh; Martin W Durkin; Andrew E Hack; Bethany B Markowitz; Edward W Cheeseman
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  2014

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cyclotorsion Measured in a Patient Population Using Three Different Methods: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Sara Flodin; Per Karlsson; Marita Andersson Grönlund
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2016-03-10

6.  Intraoperative monitoring of torsion to prevent vertical deviations during augmented vertical rectus transposition surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Interobserver reliability of the prism and alternate cover test in children with esotropia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01
  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Orbital Surgical Guidelines-Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Howard R Krauss
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-03-03

2.  Development and Preliminary Validation of a Virtual Reality Approach for Measurement of Torsional Strabismus.

Authors:  Megha Bindiganavale; David Buickians; Scott R Lambert; Zachary M Bodnar; Heather E Moss
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.415

3.  Dose Effect and Stability of Postoperative Cyclodeviation After Adjustable Harada-Ito Surgery.

Authors:  Laura Liebermann; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Bashar M Bata; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Test-retest reliability of the revised diplopia questionnaire.

Authors:  Sasha A Mansukhani; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Comparison of Methods for Measuring Cyclodeviation.

Authors:  Laura Liebermann; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Lindsay D Klaehn; Andrea M Kramer; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Measurement of ocular counter-roll using iris images during binocular fixation and head tilt.

Authors:  Kwang-Keun Oh; Byeong-Yeon Moon; Hyun Gug Cho; Sang-Yeob Kim; Dong-Sik Yu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Automated alternate cover test for 'HINTS' assessment: a validation study.

Authors:  Miranda Morrison; Hassen Kerkeni; Athanasia Korda; Simone Räss; Marco D Caversaccio; Mathias Abegg; Erich Schneider; Georgios Mantokoudis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.236

8.  A Novel Method for Evaluation of Ocular Torsion Angle by Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Katsuhide Yamadera; Hiroto Ishikawa; Ayame Imai; Mana Okamoto; Akiko Kimura; Osamu Mimura; Fumi Gomi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.283

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.